San Francisco Chronicle

Seating switcheroo on Swiss Internatio­nal Air

- By Christophe­r Elliott Christophe­r Elliott is the ombudsman for National Geographic Traveler magazine. Find travel tips at www. elliott.org. Email: chris@elliott.org Twitter: @elliottdot­org

Q: My husband, 3-month-old and I recently flew from San Francisco to Zurich with Swiss Internatio­nal Air Lines. Swiss charges for seat assignment­s. The airline will give a bassinet seat for free, but charge for a companion.

I paid $99 for my husband to sit next to us, but requested that we have the two end seats so that I could have a bit more privacy to breastfeed, and so that we didn’t have to continuall­y step over strangers every time we needed to change the baby’s diaper.

The Swiss customer-service rep denied this, saying we could have only the two middle seats because the bassinet attached only to the middle seat.

When we boarded, we found that not only was this untrue, but the bassinet could be affixed only to the end seats. So not only we were squished in the middle and having to continuall­y climb over the other passengers, but we also had to set our baby in front of strangers who were as unhappy about the situation as we were.

I paid for two seat assignment­s. I paid for my husband to sit next to me, but didn’t exactly get to pick my own seat. Because we were not given our requested seats for this situation, I want a refund of the $99 fee we had to pay. Can you help?

— Shelley Benjamin, Sacramento

A: Swiss shouldn’t have charged you anything for your seat assignment­s. This practice of charging extra for an assigned seat just seems like a money grab, especially when you’re just trying to sit next to your 3-month-old.

But if you agreed to pay the fee, and Swiss agreed that you would sit in an aisle seat, then that’s where you should have been seated. Your husband ended up in a middle seat because of incorrect informatio­n given to you by a Swiss representa­tive. I definitely think a refund is in order.

Here’s the problem: There’s no written record of the representa­tive giving you the informatio­n about your bassinet. So it’s really your word against the word of a Swiss employee. And who do you think the airline is going to believe? That’s right, not you.

I was fascinated by your subsequent correspond­ence with Swiss. The airline defended its seating charges, noting that the fees offer all customers “the opportunit­y to reserve a preferred seat when they book their flight.” In the past, Swiss notes, this was not available to all customer segments when making a reservatio­n. But in 2014, “these restrictio­ns were removed.”

“Upon payment of a fee, customers booking a flight will then be able to determine their seat as far in advance as 11 months before departure,” the representa­tive said. “Swiss is thus responding more directly to the individual needs of customers.” Yeah, right. I think you should have called Swiss’ bluff and showed up without a paid assignment. Would the airline have seated you apart? I don’t think so.

A brief, polite written appeal to the airline might have worked. I list the names, numbers and email addresses of all the Swiss customer-service executives on my consumer-advocacy site: http://elliott.org/companycon­tacts/swiss-internatio­nal-airlines. And please, no more phone conversati­ons with the airline about this issue.

I contacted Swiss on your behalf. It re-evaluated your request and decided to reimburse you for your seat assignment

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States