San Francisco Chronicle

DMV shift boosts autonomous cars

- By Carolyn Said Carolyn Said is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: csaid@ sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @csaid

Robot cars with no steering wheels, brake pedals or accelerato­r pedals — and no drivers — could be legal in California by June under updated regulation­s proposed by the state Department of Motor Vehicles on Wednesday.

However, makers of the autonomous cars must certify their safety to federal regulators under standards that are still evolving, so actual deployment is likely to take longer.

“We are excited to take the next step in furthering the developmen­t of this potentiall­y life-saving technology in California,” said Brian Kelly, state transporta­tion secretary, in a statement.

The DMV revised regulation­s it issued in March, after garnering feedback from carmakers, consumer advocates, lawmakers and insurers. Its overall goal is to pave the way for an autonomous-vehicle future being avidly pursued by dozens of carmakers, tech companies and startups.

“This sets us on a path toward the public being able to use the technologi­es put forth by vehicle manufactur­ers,” said Brian Soublet, DMV deputy director, in a media call.

California has had regulation­s allowing autonomous testing since 2014, but they require a backup driver at the wheel. Currently 42 manufactur­ers have permits here for 285 test vehicles and 996 backup drivers.

The changes since March were minor, including a template for carmakers to report on disengagem­ents (when an operator has to take control of a robot car); specifying what informatio­n companies must include when notifying local government­s about driverless testing; and outlining conditions under which companies need to amend their DMV applicatio­ns for testing or deployment.

The public has until Oct. 25 to comment on the revisions by emailing LADRegulat­ions@ dmv.ca.gov. The rulemaking process could result in enactment by the middle of next year, Soublet said.

The DMV’s rules acknowledg­e that federal authoritie­s oversee vehicle safety, while the state’s role is to enforce traffic regulation­s and licensing.

However, federal rules are in flux, with Congress currently working to hammer out autonomous-driving regulation­s.

“The DMV regulation­s for testing are a good first step,” said Laura FraadeBlan­ar, a post-doctoral fellow at the Rand Corp. “The last step is unbridled commercial availabili­ty, but we’re still a long way from that.”

Current federal regulation­s would block sales of autonomous cars altogether, so Congress is trying to conceptual­ize a system “that would allow autonomous vehicles to be made publicly available as they meet performanc­e-based safety thresholds,” she said. Input from tests such as those in California is invaluable to that process.

The federal law could preempt states’ rights to enact their own selfdrivin­g rules, said Bryant Walker Smith, a University of South Carolina law professor affiliated with Stanford’s Center for Internet and Society.

“Confusing language (of the current Senate bill, S1885) could be interprete­d very broadly to preempt (i.e., negate) all kinds of traffic laws, data protection laws, and other laws of general applicatio­n,” he said in an email.

But Smith said, “I am struck that California’s DMV is becoming increasing­ly nimble in updating its rules in response to developmen­ts in the technologi­es, applicatio­ns, and federal regulation of automated driving. Good for them.”

Some consumer advocates had a different take.

“The new California DMV proposal wrongly relies on the federal government, when there are absolutely no federal motor vehicle safety standards applying specifical­ly to autonomous vehicle technology,” said John Simpson, privacy project director at Consumer Watchdog, a nonprofit that advocates for taxpayer and consumer interests, in a statement. He noted that the U.S. Department of Transporta­tion’s recent “Vision for Safety 2.0” autonomous­car guidelines stress that they are voluntary.

California’s rules apply only to vehicles under 10,000 pounds, meaning that autonomous trucks are not legal here. DMV officials said those vehicles will be addressed separately.

 ?? Paul Chinn / The Chronicle ?? The updated regulation­s could eventually remove the requiremen­t for a backup driver in robot cars.
Paul Chinn / The Chronicle The updated regulation­s could eventually remove the requiremen­t for a backup driver in robot cars.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States