San Francisco Chronicle

‘Dreamer’ decision on hold until ’18

Dems hopeful they can reach agreement with GOP

- By Carolyn Lochhead

WASHINGTON — A deal to provide permanent legal status to young immigrants who came to the country illegally as children will be delayed until January, lawmakers said Wednesday, dashing hopes for a resolution before Christmas.

But negotiator­s were optimistic that some resolution would be reached in January.

“While I am disappoint­ed we were unable to find a solution before the end of the year, this is not a partisan issue, and I am confident we will reach an agreement for DACA recipients early next year,” said Rep. David Valadao, R-Hanford (Kings County), referring to roughly 800,000 young immigrants who are losing their temporary legal status under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program.

President Trump ended the program in September, but gave Congress until March 5 to act before subjecting the immigrants, often

called “Dreamers,” to potential deportatio­n. Valadao is among 34 House Republican­s who wrote House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., this month to insist on action.

Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., who had secured a promise of action on the Dreamers from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., in exchange for his support for the tax bill, said Wednesday that McConnell had “committed to bring the bipartisan DACA bill we are currently negotiatin­g to the Senate floor in January.”

Democrats, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco and California Sen. Kamala Harris, had repeatedly insisted that their support for a year-end spending bill, which must be approved by midnight Friday to keep the government operating, depended on inclusion of a solution for Dreamers.

Republican­s, for their part, had declared that the matter could wait until March, the deportatio­n deadline, and party leaders have insisted that immigratio­n issues be left out of the spending bill. For a large bloc of the House GOP, any expansion of immigratio­n is a nonstarter.

Activists, who have been pressing for a resolution before the end of the year, said they were frustrated by the delay, but still hopeful.

“There’s a lot of disappoint­ment and anger on the part of Dreamers and their allies given the crisis that’s been created,” said Frank Sharry, founder and executive director of America’s Voice, an immigratio­n advocacy group. “But I’m optimistic that we have a decent chance to produce a breakthrou­gh in January. In my view, we’ve lost time, but we haven’t lost leverage.”

More than 1,000 Dreamers swarmed the Capitol this week demanding action. Some camped out in front of Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office, and two were arrested.

On Wednesday, Democrat Kevin de León, president of the California state Senate, lashed out at Pelosi and Feinstein, D-Calif., whom he is challengin­g in next year’s election, during a news conference in Los Angeles. “Don’t come back to California if you haven’t demonstrat­ed your leadership and your courage to stand up for these young men and women,” he told them.

DeLeón praised Harris, who said at a Dreamers rally Wednesday that Democratic leaders in Washington claim to have power. “Well, use your power,” she told them. “Use your power. Keep our promise to these young people.”

But 10 Senate Democrats are up for re-election next year in states Trump won, and some made clear this week that they had no appetite for shutting down the government over an immigratio­n issue.

“These Dreamer activists are in the Capitol and they’re demanding Senate Democrats filibuster the spending bill to shut the government down at Christmas time if there’s no DACA fix, and that’s just not going to happen,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigratio­n Studies, a research group that favors reduced immigratio­n. “It would be a political disaster for the Democrats.”

Lawmakers in both parties and both chambers are negotiatin­g to find some form of protected status for the Dreamers in exchange for increased border enforcemen­t. Democrats have insisted that any deal not include the border wall that Trump campaigned on, but Republican­s are waiting for the White House to clarify its bottom line.

Speaking after a Cabinet meeting Wednesday, Trump laid out several immigratio­n goals. Although he did not connect these demands to the Dreamers, those who want to reduce immigratio­n see them as part of a potential deal.

Trump mentioned a border wall and an end to “chain migration,” a reference to family immigratio­n categories that allow citizens to apply for entry by their siblings, adult children and parents. He also said he wanted to terminate the diversity visa, which allows 50,000 people to enter the country after random selection through a lottery.

“There’s going to be some pulling and tug-of-war over what’s going to be in a final (Dreamers) bill,” Krikorian said.

Sharry dismissed the suggestion of restrictio­ns on other immigratio­n categories as posturing, saying they would be poison pills for Democrats.

“They’re asking for the moon,” Sharry said. “I get it. They’re positionin­g . ... But (a Dreamers bill) is going to pass because Democrats support it, and Democrats aren’t going to support the hard-line nativist agenda.”

He said any deal has “pretty clear parameters,” which include “a path to citizenshi­p for young immigrants and a modest border-security package.”

 ?? Tom Brenner / New York Times ?? Supporters of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program occupy the office of Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., during a Capitol Hill demonstrat­ion over the delay in finding a resolution.
Tom Brenner / New York Times Supporters of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program occupy the office of Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., during a Capitol Hill demonstrat­ion over the delay in finding a resolution.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States