San Francisco Chronicle

No more patching and praying — it’s time to privatize Oroville Dam

- By Lawrence J. McQuillan and Hayeon Carol Park Lawrence J. McQuillan is director of the Center on Entreprene­urial Innovation at the Independen­t Institute. Hayeon Carol Park is a policy researcher.

Just about one year ago, the collapse of two spillways at Oroville Dam forced the frantic evacuation of 188,000 people, caused millions of dollars in property damage and triggered hundreds of lawsuits. Earlier this month, an independen­t forensic team found that decades of reckless mismanagem­ent by the California Department of Water Resources caused the crisis. Instead of making needed changes, Sacramento has responded by increasing the department’s control.

What’s needed instead is to transfer Oroville Dam and California’s 43 other stateowned dams to private ownership and operation.

This is not a radical idea; 64 percent of the 90,580 dams in the Army Corps of Engineers’ national inventory are privately owned. Even here in California, the figure is 43 percent.

Dam safety experts faulted the Department of Water Resources for “ineffectiv­e and possibly detrimenta­l” repairs, inadequate procedures to “identify risks and manage safety,” and for being “overconfid­ent and complacent,” conducting “very little actual research.” The problems persist.

Cracks were detected in sections of the newly reconstruc­ted main flood-control spillway. Predictabl­y, department spokeswoma­n Erin Mellon downplayed the cracks as “something you expect to see.”

Not according to UC Berkeley civil engineerin­g Professor Emeritus Robert Bea, an expert on dams, who said, “Cracking in high-strength reinforced concrete structures is never ‘to be expected’ ” and can be deadly, allowing water to corrode steel embedded in the concrete.

Indeed, “Such corrosion was responsibl­e for the ... ultimate failure of the steel reinforcin­g in parts of the original gated (Oroville Dam main) spillway,” Bea said.

The department also estimates the reconstruc­tion costs at $500 million, nearly double the initial estimate of $275 million, after workers discovered they must dig deeper than expected to reach bedrock.

Department of Water Resources mismanagem­ent is not new. During Oroville Dam’s relicensin­g more than 12 years ago, environmen­tal groups filed a motion with federal regulators to require the department to armor with concrete the emergency spillway’s earthen hillside. Despite the warnings and precaution­ary recommenda­tions, regulators and the department failed to act.

Safety experts also found that the department allowed the dam’s main spillway to be built on faulty bedrock, used thin layers of concrete around vital spillway joints, and tolerated a flawed drainage system and cracks, allowing water to seep into the chute’s interior. Shoddy maintenanc­e was commonplac­e during 50 years of preventabl­e decay.

In response to the debacle, Gov. Jerry Brown issued a weak four-point plan, and the department created three deputy directors. But more layers of bureaucrac­y won’t solve the problems that bureaucrac­y helped create. Institutio­nal reform is needed.

Currently, more than half (53 percent) of the 1,585 California dams monitored by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are categorize­d as having a “high hazard potential,” where “loss of human life is likely if the dam fails.” Nationally, the figure is 17 percent. Having the Department of Water Resources at the helm, with its opaque patch-and-pray approach to maintenanc­e and public safety, is not reassuring.

Government ownership of infrastruc­ture such as the Oroville Dam comes with little accountabi­lity and the automatic assumption of taxpayer bailouts when problems arise, which increases the likelihood that they will.

The Clinton administra­tion, in its “reinventin­g government” initiative, provided a blueprint for how this transfer process can work. The administra­tion sold 19 federal water projects to nonfederal owners by 2006.

Do private dams of similar size and age as government­owned dams have a better safety record? There appear to be no studies. Private ownership of dam assets, however, concentrat­es accountabi­lity and the costs of failure, which properly incentiviz­es more effective maintenanc­e, timely repairs, increased innovation and efficiency. In the case of Oroville Dam, private ownership would mean putting responsibi­lity for reservoir and outlet maintenanc­e, and flood control, in the hands of individual­s whose interests revolve around ensuring public safety and the function of the dam.

Total dam failure in California is not speculatio­n. In 1928, the government-owned St. Francis Dam north of Los Angeles collapsed from a defective foundation, destroying towns and killing 450 people.

California­ns deserve safe and profession­al management of state dams through responsibl­e private ownership.

 ?? Michael Macor / The Chronicle 2017 ?? Water is released over the Lake Oroville spillway on Feb. 10, after last winter’s rains left water levels dangerousl­y high. Constant releases damaged the spillway and put the dam at risk.
Michael Macor / The Chronicle 2017 Water is released over the Lake Oroville spillway on Feb. 10, after last winter’s rains left water levels dangerousl­y high. Constant releases damaged the spillway and put the dam at risk.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States