San Francisco Chronicle

Nobel laureate no longer backs press freedoms

- By Todd Pitman Todd Pitman is an Associated Press writer.

BANGKOK — When five Myanmar journalist­s were sentenced to decade-long prison terms for reporting the alleged existence of a military-run chemical weapons factory in Myanmar a few years ago, Aung San Suu Kyi — then an opposition lawmaker and winner of the 1991 Nobel Peace Prize — condemned the harsh punishment­s as “very excessive.”

The journalist­s, from the now-defunct Unity publicatio­n, had been convicted for violating the nation’s Official Secrets Act — the same colonial-era law now being leveled against a pair of Reuters reporters each facing a staggering 14 years behind bars.

“It’s not that I don’t accept a concern over national security,” Suu Kyi told supporters during a July 2014 rally, according to an article published at the time in the Irrawaddy, a local media outlet. “But in a democratic system, security should be in balance with freedom.”

When “the rights of journalist­s (to report) are being controlled,” Suu Kyi said, the very notion of democratic reform in Myanmar is “questionab­le.”

Three and a half years on, the thinking of Suu Kyi, who now heads the government, has apparently changed dramatical­ly. Rather than champion the press, she has presided over an administra­tion whose courts have aggressive­ly pursued legal charges against dozens of journalist­s, along with other attempts to suppress and discredit the media.

Police arrested Reuters reporters Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo on Dec. 12 while they were investigat­ing the massacre of 10 ethnic Rohingya Muslims. But when former U.N. ambassador Bill Richardson met the Nobel Peace prize laureate this month and brought up the case against the Reuters reporters, it “brought almost an explosion on her part,” Richardson said.

Suu Kyi’s spokesman, Zaw Htay, has said that Richardson exceeded his mandate by bringing up the issue. Richardson had been invited to the country to participat­e in an advisory panel on the Rohingya crisis; he withdrew, calling it a “whitewash.”

Hostility against the media, particular­ly internatio­nal news agencies covering Myanmar, has risen markedly since a brutal army “clearance” operation began in August immediatel­y after Rohingya insurgents staged an unpreceden­ted wave of attacks. More than 700,000 Rohingya, a persecuted minority widely despised by the nation’s Buddhist majority, have been driven into Bangladesh since.

Reporters and human rights groups covering the crisis have documented grave atrocities, including mass rape, several massacres, mass graves and widespread arson attacks that left hundreds of Rohingya villages burned to the ground.

Suu Kyi’s government has routinely denied atrocities and staunchly defended the military’s actions, portraying critical media reports as “fake news” in what analysts say is an effort to discredit independen­t media reports and limit reporting.

They’re “doing everything in their power to block the flow of news, to ensure that no damaging informatio­n comes to light,” said Shawn Crispin of the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalist­s.

 ?? Mark Baker / Associated Press 2015 ?? Aung San Suu Kyi’s government has pursued legal charges against dozens of journalist­s, along with other attempts to suppress and discredit the media.
Mark Baker / Associated Press 2015 Aung San Suu Kyi’s government has pursued legal charges against dozens of journalist­s, along with other attempts to suppress and discredit the media.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States