San Francisco Chronicle

Justices sidestep abortion question on Indiana law

- By Adam Liptak Associated Press contribute­d to this report. Adam Liptak is a New York Times writer.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday sidesteppe­d part of a case that could have tested the constituti­onal right to abortion establishe­d in Roe v. Wade, turning down an appeal to reinstate a strict Indiana abortion law. But the court, in an apparent compromise, upheld part of the same law regulating the disposal of fetal remains.

The first part of the law banned abortions sought solely because of fetal characteri­stics like sex or disability. The law’s second provision required abortion providers to bury or cremate fetal remains.

The court’s decision, issued without briefing on the merits or oral arguments, was unsigned and just three pages long. It stressed that its decision upholding the fetal-remains provision “does not implicate our cases applying the undue burden test to abortion regulation­s.”

Indiana, the court said, has a “legitimate interest in proper disposal of fetal remains,” quoting an earlier decision.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor said they would have denied review of both issues in the case.

The case, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, No. 18-483, had been closely watched because it could have given the Supreme Court its first chance to consider the constituti­onality of a state law restrictin­g abortion since Justice Brett Kavanaugh replaced Justice Anthony Kennedy last year.

Kennedy had been a cautious supporter of abortion rights, while Kavanaugh’s limited record on the subject as an appeals court judge suggested some skepticism.

The modest move Tuesday left for another day the considerat­ion of state laws limiting abortion that were enacted, at least partly, to challenge the court’s decision in 1973 in Roe v. Wade.

The Indiana law was enacted in 2016 and signed by Gov. Mike Pence, now the vice president. It prohibited all abortions, at any time during a pregnancy, solely sought based on the fetus’s sex, or because it had been diagnosed with Down syndrome or another disability, or because of characteri­stics like race or national origin.

The state law also imposed limits on the disposal of fetal remains, though it allowed mass cremations and did not impose any restrictio­ns on women who disposed of the remains themselves.

A statement issued by Pence’s office Tuesday said he “commends the Supreme Court for upholding a portion of Indiana law that safeguards the sanctity of human life by requiring that remains of aborted babies be treated with respect and dignity.” “We remain hopeful,” the statement said, “that at a later date the Supreme Court will review one of numerous state laws across the U.S. that bar abortion based on sex, race or disability.”

Also Tuesday, Planned Parenthood officials said Missouri’s only abortion clinic could be closed by the end of the week. The officials said in a teleconfer­ence that the current license for the St. Louis facility expires Friday. If not renewed, the organizati­on said Missouri would become the first state without a functionin­g abortion clinic since the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision.

Missouri is among half a dozen states that have passed sweeping antiaborti­on measures. Republican Gov. Mike Parson signed a bill Friday banning abortions on or beyond the eighth week of pregnancy, with no exceptions for rape or incest.

 ?? Hilary Swift / New York Times ?? Abortion rights activists gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court. The court upheld a law regulating fetal remains.
Hilary Swift / New York Times Abortion rights activists gather outside the U.S. Supreme Court. The court upheld a law regulating fetal remains.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States