San Francisco Chronicle

Lawmakers take on a deluge of plastics

Legislatio­n would force cut in single-use materials

- By Dustin Gardiner

SACRAMENTO — Even in an eco-conscious city like San Francisco, more than 9,000 tons of recyclable­s are dumped in landfills every year largely due to one culprit: flimsy plastics.

Low-grade plastics, such as shopping bags, padded online shipping envelopes and food packaging, are piling up in recycling centers. Part of the reason is that overseas markets such as China and the Philippine­s — which used to buy America’s trash by the shipload — are turning most plastics away.

California lawmakers say the state must act to stop plastics from crowding landfills and polluting the ocean. They’ve proposed sweeping legislatio­n to require manufactur­ers to reduce the reliance on single-use plastics.

Supporters say the legislatio­n reflects a game-changing realizatio­n: Supposedly recyclable plastic shipped overseas for decades often was never easily recycled. Instead, it polluted other countries.

That’s because the low-grade material has little value — it’s already broken down to a weak form and difficult to reuse profitably. Rigid plastics, such as water bottles and milk jugs, are easier to recycle.

The majority of the plastic that Bay Area residents throw away

belongs in the “problemati­c” category, said Eric Potashner, vice president of Recology, the Bay Area solid-waste hauler.

“It is going to the landfill more often than not,” he said. “We can successful­ly sort those materials. The problem is, there’s no buyer.”

Some Democratic lawmakers say California can take the lead in solving the problem by passing laws aimed at reducing demand for plastics designed to be used once and tossed in the trash.

They say the solution also requires pushing the plastics industry to design recyclable products and reuse its own material — thereby replacing the lost overseas market.

Two identical bills are at the center of the effort: AB1080 by Assemblywo­man Lorena Gonzalez, D-San Diego, and SB54 by state Sen. Ben Allen, DSanta Monica. The measures would require the state to cut the amount of single-use plastics going to landfills by 75 percent by 2030, by either reducing use or making disposable plastics more easily recyclable or compostabl­e.

But the effort faces powerful opposition from the plastics industry and business groups.

The California Chamber of Commerce has labeled the proposal a “job killer,” arguing that “unpreceden­ted” regulation­s would dramatical­ly increase costs to manufactur­e products in the state.

Tim Shestek, a lobbyist for the American Chemistry Council, which represents plastic companies, said the industry is “on record saying that we’re interested in a solution.” But he said the bills aren’t clear about what counts as a single-use item.

Shestek said the bills also wouldn’t do anything to improve California’s recycling infrastruc­ture. Many communitie­s aren’t set up to handle a huge influx of compostabl­e trash or more recyclable­s, he said.

He said the industry has a goal of making 100 percent of plastic packaging reusable or recoverabl­e by 2040, adding that the council wouldn’t set that goal “if we weren’t serious about trying to address the issue.”

However, lawmakers who support the bills say the accumulati­on of plastic pollution in marine habitats and elsewhere makes it clear that faster action is needed.

“Plastics are frankly strangling the health of our oceans,” Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, said as the Senate debated SB54 last month. “This is a huge problem, and it’s time to move past baby steps to address it.”

Each bill passed in its house of origin last month, and could be amended before coming to a final vote. Lawmakers will probably decide at some point to advance a single version.

The proposals were already watered down so a requiremen­t that manufactur­ers make all single-use plastics recyclable or compostabl­e now would apply only to the 10 most-littered products.

Those 10 products — which could include such items as shopping bags and disposable utensils — would be determined based on state litter surveys. CalRecycle, the state’s recycling agency, would have authority to adopt the rules by 2023.

The bills would have a sweeping impact on shipping materials, requiring all packaging used by online retailers and others to be recyclable or compostabl­e by 2023.

Charles Sheehan, a spokesman for the San Francisco Department of the Environmen­t, said changes in consumer behavior, such as the growth of Amazon, have created far more single-use waste than the city dealt with in the past.

“The convenienc­e culture is driving this culture of disposabil­ity,” he said. “That convenienc­e really has come frankly at the expense of the environmen­t.”

A related bill, AB792 by Assemblyma­n Phil Ting, DSan Francisco, would require beverage companies to use 75 percent recycled content in plastic bottles by the year 2034. The original measure called for 100 percent, but was amended after the soda industry lobbied for changes.

Ting said plastic pollution is a global crisis, noting that scientists predict that plastics in the ocean will outweigh fish by 2050. He said it’s “completely paramount that we go do something this year.”

The American Beverage Associatio­n, which represents soda companies, still opposes the amended version of AB792. It argues that there isn’t enough recycled plastic on the market that meets safety requiremen­ts for beverage containers.

The bills, which are sponsored by California­ns Against Waste and a host of other environmen­tal groups, mark an important strategic shift for lawmakers wrangling with plastic pollution.

Past efforts focused on single products, like bans on plastic shopping bags and straws. But retailers have found workaround­s, like shifting to thicker plastic bags that are “reusable” but still not easily recycled.

Nick Lapis, director of advocacy for California­ns Against Waste, said the bills are unlike past legislatio­n because they empower CalRecycle to make the rules so it can keep pace with changes in the plastics industry. He said advocates have grown frustrated by manufactur­ers’ reaction to the state’s efforts.

“Legislator­s realize you can’t keep saying no as whales wash up on our shores full of plastic bags,” Lapis said.

 ?? Josie Norris / The Chronicle ?? A wall of baled plastic looming over Recology’s Recycle Central represents one day’s worth of San Francisco’s plastic and water bottles. Low-grade plastic shipped to other countries has polluted them.
Josie Norris / The Chronicle A wall of baled plastic looming over Recology’s Recycle Central represents one day’s worth of San Francisco’s plastic and water bottles. Low-grade plastic shipped to other countries has polluted them.
 ?? Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle ?? At Recology’s initial sort deck, Tim Coleman separates out pieces of environmen­t-unfriendly flimsy and film plastic destined for landfill.
Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle At Recology’s initial sort deck, Tim Coleman separates out pieces of environmen­t-unfriendly flimsy and film plastic destined for landfill.
 ?? Josie Norris / The Chronicle ?? Sorters on the container line separate oceans of refuse by material for recycling at Recology’s Recycle Central.
Josie Norris / The Chronicle Sorters on the container line separate oceans of refuse by material for recycling at Recology’s Recycle Central.
 ?? Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle ?? Plastic bottles — a higher-grade material that can be recycled — are jammed into a baler at Recology.
Lea Suzuki / The Chronicle Plastic bottles — a higher-grade material that can be recycled — are jammed into a baler at Recology.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States