San Francisco Chronicle

Activists assail plan to bail out nuke, coal plants

- By John Seewer John Seewer is an Associated Press writer.

TOLEDO, Ohio — A financial rescue for Ohio’s nuclear facilities and two coalfired plants that will force the state’s residents and businesses to fork over roughly $1.5 billion is galvanizin­g environmen­talists and some conservati­ves.

Advocacy groups and investors, incensed by what they call a bailout and how it will diminish the state’s natural gas and green energy options, are looking at mounting a campaign to overturn it and targeting Republican­s who backed it. Organizati­ons representi­ng the state’s seniors and manufactur­ing plants are upset, too.

The upheaval comes as the Trump administra­tion continues with its pledge to boost the nuclear and coal industries by easing regulation­s and guaranteei­ng loans for two new commercial reactors. But the fallout in Ohio shows how attempting to influence the market can be risky and alienate a wide swath of voters.

“We’re getting involved in an area where the government has no business sticking their nose,” said state Rep. Craig Riedel, a conservati­ve from northweste­rn Ohio. “What we did with this bill is we absolutely tipped the scales to the nuclear plants.”

Five states within the past three years have approved nuclear bailouts totaling at least $13 billion, funded by new charges on electricit­y customers. But Ohio is the first under Republican control to do so. Unlike the other states, its plan also cuts away at incentives for wind and solar projects.

The plan signed into law last week by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine calls for giving the state’s two nuclear plants $150 million a year through 2026.

The money will come from monthly surcharges of 85 cents for residentia­l customers and up to $2,400 for major industrial plants. Another statewide fee will be added for the two coal plants.

Those behind it say it will save several thousand jobs and protect the nuclear plants that account for nearly all of Ohio’s clean energy.

“From an environmen­tal point of view we need to keep them; from an economic point of view and a jobs point of view, we need to keep them,” DeWine said this week.

Although a majority of the Republican­controlled Legislatur­e backed the proposal, plenty of conservati­ves felt it went too far, picking winners and losers in the free market.

Akronbased FirstEnerg­y Solutions, which is going through bankruptcy reorganiza­tion, spent millions on lobbying and campaign contributi­ons while it was trying to persuade federal and state officials to give the nuclear plants a lifeline.

 ?? Ron Schwane / Associated Press 2017 ?? The DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station in Oak Harbor is operated by a subsidiary of FirstEnerg­y Corp. Ohio lawmakers approved aid for nuclear stations and two coalfired plants.
Ron Schwane / Associated Press 2017 The DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station in Oak Harbor is operated by a subsidiary of FirstEnerg­y Corp. Ohio lawmakers approved aid for nuclear stations and two coalfired plants.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States