San Francisco Chronicle

Political party can keep its name

- By Trapper Byrne Trapper Byrne is the San Francisco Chronicle political editor. Email: tbyrne @sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @trapperbyr­ne

Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill that would have forced the 52yearold American Independen­t Party to change its name in order to appear on the California ballot.

SB696 would have prevented any political party in the state from using “independen­t” in its name. State Sen. Tom Umberg, the Santa Ana Democrat who carried the bill, made it clear he had the American Independen­t Party in mind when he introduced the legislatio­n, saying voters were mistakenly signing up with the party when they thought they were registerin­g as independen­ts.

His bill would also have prevented parties from using “decline to state” or “no party preference” in their names.

American Independen­t Party officials called the measure unconstitu­tional, and Newsom said they were probably right.

“By requiring one existing political party to change its current name, this bill could be interprete­d as a violation of the rights of free speech and associatio­n guaranteed by the First and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constituti­on,” Newsom wrote in his veto message Wednesday night. It echoed wordforwor­d a nonpartisa­n analysis of the bill by state Senate staff.

The American Independen­t Party is an ultraconse­rvative party formed in 1967 as a vehicle for segregatio­nist Alabama Gov. George Wallace’s presidenti­al campaign. It is headquarte­red in Vacaville and has 517,872 registered voters, more than the combined totals of California’s three other minor parties — the Libertaria­ns, the Greens and the Peace and Freedom Party.

Umberg’s bill said the ban on “independen­t” was necessary because “voter education is ineffectiv­e in remedying” confusion that leads people to register as American Independen­t members when they really want to be independen­ts. American Independen­t officials called the assertion “remarkable (and inherently insulting to voters).”

The party didn’t run any statewide candidates in 2018, choosing instead to endorse Republican­s.

“By existing requiring political one party to change its current name, this bill could be interprete­d as a violation of the rights of free speech.” Gov. Gavin Newsom

 ?? Rich Pedroncell­i / Associated Press ?? Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill Wednesday that would have forced the ultraconse­rvative American Independen­t Party to change its name in order to appear on the California ballot.
Rich Pedroncell­i / Associated Press Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed a bill Wednesday that would have forced the ultraconse­rvative American Independen­t Party to change its name in order to appear on the California ballot.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States