San Francisco Chronicle

Intelligen­ce briefings test Trump’s attention span

- By Julian E. Barnes and Adam Goldman Julian E. Barnes and Adam Goldman are New York Times writers.

WASHINGTON — President Trump has blamed many others for his administra­tion’s flawed response to the coronaviru­s: China, governors, the Obama administra­tion, the World Health Organizati­on. In recent weeks, he has also faulted the informatio­n he received from an obscure analyst who delivers his intelligen­ce briefings.

Trump has insisted that the intelligen­ce agencies gave him inadequate warnings about the threat of the virus, describing it as “not a big deal.” Intelligen­ce officials have publicly backed him, acknowledg­ing that Beth Sanner, the analyst who regularly briefs the president, underplaye­d the dangers when she first mentioned the virus to him Jan. 23.

But in blaming Sanner, a CIA analyst with three decades of experience, Trump ignored a host of warnings he received around that time from higherrank­ing officials, epidemiolo­gists, scientists, biodefense officials, other national security aides and the news media about the virus’s growing threat. Trump’s own health secretary had alerted him five days earlier to the potential seriousnes­s of the virus.

By the time of the Jan. 23 intelligen­ce briefing, many government officials were already alarmed by the signs of a crisis in China, where the virus first broke out, and of a world on the brink of disaster. Within days, other national security warnings prompted the Trump administra­tion to restrict travel from China. But the United States lost its chance to more effectivel­y mitigate the coronaviru­s in the following weeks when Trump balked at further measures that might have slowed its spread.

Trump, who has mounted a yearslong attack on the intelligen­ce agencies, is particular­ly difficult to brief on critical national security matters, according to interviews with 10 current and former intelligen­ce officials familiar with his intelligen­ce briefings.

The president veers off on tangents, and getting him back on topic is difficult, they said. He has a short attention span and rarely, if ever, reads intelligen­ce reports, relying instead on conservati­ve media and his friends for informatio­n. He is unashamed to interrupt intelligen­ce officers and riff based on tips or gossip he hears from former casino magnate Steve Wynn, retired golfer Gary Player or Christophe­r Ruddy, the conservati­ve media executive.

Trump rarely absorbs informatio­n that he disagrees with or that runs counter to his worldview, the officials said. Briefing him has been so great a challenge compared with his predecesso­rs that the intelligen­ce agencies have hired outside consultant­s to study how better to present informatio­n to him.

Richard Grenell, the acting director of national intelligen­ce, said that the idea that Trump was difficult in intelligen­ce briefings is “flat wrong.”

“When you are there, you see a president questionin­g the assumption­s and using the opportunit­y to broaden the discussion to include realworld perspectiv­es,” Grenell said.

 ?? Erin Schaff / New York Times ?? Richard Grenell (left), the acting director of national intelligen­ce, and National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien often sit in on the president’s briefings.
Erin Schaff / New York Times Richard Grenell (left), the acting director of national intelligen­ce, and National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien often sit in on the president’s briefings.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States