New Jersey will ban even paper bags
Paper or plastic? In New Jersey, try neither.
The state Legislature voted this week to make New Jersey the first in the country to ban singleuse paper bags in supermarkets along with all singleuse plastic bags in stores and restaurants.
Eight other states, including California, New York and Vermont, have bans on singleuse plastic bags either in effect now or scheduled to go into effect in the coming years.
But by banning both plastic and paper singleuse bags, as well as disposable food containers and cups made out of polystyrene foam, environmental advocates said the New Jersey bill is among the most stringent in the United States.
“This bill is probably the strongest, most comprehensive bill in the nation dealing with plastics and packaging,” said Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club, which had been helping lead the campaign for the ban. “It will go a long way in our battle with plastic pollution.”
Opponents of the bill had argued that it could hurt businesses and that the ban should be limited to plastic bags, since many view paper bags as an environmentally friendly alternative.
But Tittel said that by banning paper bags, New Jersey will be pushing people to use bags made out of recycled or other sustainable materials.
Heidi Brock, CEO of the American Forest and Paper Association, which represents companies in the paper industry, said she hopes the governor will block the ban on paper bags.
“The New Jersey Legislature has undermined an environmentally responsible option for consumers,” she said in a statement. “Furthermore, the ban on paper bags sends an alarming message in devaluing family wage jobs, which are often union labor, in addition to the indirect jobs supported by the paper and wood products industry in the state.”
The ban is set to begin 18 months after the bill goes into effect. A spokesman for Gov. Phil Murphy said that Murphy intends to sign it.
“The governor is proud to support the strongest bag ban in the nation,” said Mahen Gunaratna. “This bill will significantly reduce the harm that these products cause to our environment.”
Both singleuse plastic and paper bags have environmental costs that have drawn the scrutiny of environmental advocates and lawmakers.
Plastic bags, which can take centuries to decompose, represent about 12% of the total plastic waste in America. Paper bags typically require more energy and greenhouse gas emissions to produce.
States and cities have adopted a patchwork of different bag use policies. Some, like New York state, have focused on banning the distribution of plastic bags, which have long been associated with litter and pollution.
States have also adopted less restrictive measures to dissuade people from using paper bags. In California, stores must charge at least 10 cents for recycled paper bags.
The New Jersey bill does not apply to bags used solely to wrap meat or fish, laundry bags or newspaper bags, among other exceptions.
The bill attracted the support of the New Jersey Food Council, an industry group representing food retailers and suppliers, which argued that navigating different policies about what bags could be used in different municipalities across the state is burdensome.
“The ban on paper bags is critically important; they have just as significant of an environmental impact as plastic bags,” said Linda Doherty, CEO of the council. “Without this ban, consumers would have simply moved to paper singleuse bags, failing to address the underlying goal of reducing our reliance on singleuse products.”
Other industry groups have opposed the ban.
Dennis Hart, executive director of the Chemistry Council of New Jersey, said that legislators rushed to pass the bill without carefully considering the relative benefits of polystyrene products compared with alternatives. He said the ban would hurt manufacturers and other businesses.
“New Jersey’s restaurants, God knows how many of them are going to survive the pandemic,” he said. “Even if they do, they’re going to be in financially bad shape for a very long time. All this bill is going to do is add more burden of cost for a less quality product.”