San Francisco Chronicle

Move toward leniency for kids who kill may end

- By Jessica Gresko Jessica Gresko is an Associated Press writer.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Tuesday suggested it could halt what has been a gradual move toward more leniency for children who are convicted of murder.

In cases over more than a decade, the court has concluded that children should be treated differentl­y from adults, in part because of their lack of maturity. But the court, which has become more conservati­ve over the last few years, could decide not to go any further.

The justices on Tuesday were hearing a case about sentencing juveniles to life without parole. The court has previously said that should be rare, and the question before the justices has to do with what courts must do before deciding to impose a life-without-parole sentence on a juvenile.

During arguments, which the justices heard by phone because of the coronaviru­s pandemic, Justice Samuel Alito suggested the court has gone too far.

“What would you say to any members of this court who are concerned that we have now gotten lightyears away from the original meaning of the Eighth Amendment and who are reluctant to go any further on this travel into space?” Alito asked at one point, referencin­g the amendment’s prohibitio­n against “cruel and unusual” punishment.

Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch also indicated they take issue with the court’s most recent case about juvenile life sentences.

The case the court was hearing Tuesday is the latest in a series of cases going back to 2005, when the court eliminated the death penalty for juveniles. Five years later, the court barred life-without-parole sentences for juveniles, except in cases where a juvenile has killed someone.

Then, in 2012, the justices in a 54 decision said juveniles who kill can’t automatica­lly be sentenced to life with no chance of parole. A related decision four years later said those sentences should be reserved “for all but the rarest of juvenile offenders, those whose crimes reflect permanent incorrigib­ility.”

The justices are now being asked whether a juvenile has to be found to be “permanentl­y incorrigib­le,” incapable of being rehabilita­ted, before being sentenced to life without parole.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States