San Francisco Chronicle

Votes going against affirmativ­e action

- CHRONICLE STAFF REPORT

Returns for initiative­s on the statewide ballot as reported by the California Secretary of State’s Office. Totals include 60% of inperson voting precincts and several million mail ballots. An undetermin­ed number of latearrivi­ng mail ballots are still to be counted.

Propositio­n 14: Would refund the California Institute for Regenerati­ve Medicine, the state’s stem cell agency, by allowing it to issue $ 5.5 billion in bonds for research, training and facilities constructi­on. YES: 51.7% NO: 48.3% Propositio­n 15: Would revise Propositio­n 13, the 1978 law limiting property tax increases, by allowing for more frequent reassessme­nts of commercial property.

YES: 49.1% NO: 50.9%

Propositio­n 16: Would lift the state ban on affirmativ­e action in public university admissions and government contractin­g and hiring. YES: 45.0% NO: 55.0%

Propositio­n 17: Would restore voting rights of people on parole who have finished their state or federal prison terms. YES: 59.9% NO: 40.1%

Propositio­n 18: Would give 17yearolds the vote in primary elections if they will turn 18 before the general election. YES: 45.8% NO: 54.2% Propositio­n 19: Would allow older homeowners to keep a lower property tax assessment when they move. Would reassess inherited homes valued at more than $ 1 million if the late owner’s children or grandchild­ren don’t intend to live in them. YES: 52.0% NO: 48.0%

Propositio­n 20: Would expand the list of crimes for which there is no early release, adding sex traffickin­g of a child and felony domestic violence. Would require DNA collection for those convicted of several types of misdemeano­rs.

YES: 36.9% NO: 63.1%

Propositio­n 21: Would allow local government­s to expand rent control to cover newer buildings, singlefami­ly homes and apartments vacated by tenants. YES: 40.7% NO: 59.3% Propositio­n 22: Would exempt appbased drivers such as those who work for Uber, Lyft and DoorDash from a state law that classifies some gig workers as employees. YES: 58.0% NO: 42.0% Propositio­n 23: Would increase state regulation of kidney dialysis clinics. YES: 35.9% NO: 64.1% Propositio­n 24: Would expand the data privacy law that California passed in 2018. YES: 56.6% NO: 43.4% Propositio­n 25: Would affirm state legislatio­n to replace money bail with evaluation of defendant’s safety or flight risk. YES: 45.5% NO: 54.5%

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States