San Francisco Chronicle

Warriors must pay for arena renovation

- By Bob Egelko Bob Egelko is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: begelko@ sfchronicl­e. com Twitter: @ BobEgelko

The state Supreme Court rejected theWarrior­s’ appeal Wednesday of a ruling requiring the team to pay Oakland and Alameda County for constructi­on work on the arena where they played for decades before leaving for San Francisco last year.

The constructi­on began in 1996, 25 years after the team moved from San Francisco to Oakland. Oakland and Alameda County dismantled and redesigned the interior of the 19,000seat arena, now known as Oakland Arena, and issued $ 140 million in bonds to pay the costs over 30 years.

The agreement allowed the Warriors to leave after 10 years if they paid the debt in full. If they stayed longer than 20 years but acted to terminate the agreement before 2027, they were required to continue paying off the bonds, minus profits to the local government­s from other uses of the arena.

But when theWarrior­s announced plans to move back across the bay before the 201920 season — a move allowed under the contract — their lawyers argued that the team did not owe any more money because it did not “terminate” its agreement by exercising its right to leave. According to Henry Gardner, interim executive director of the Coliseum Authority, the unpaid amount is about $ 45 million.

An arbitrator and a San Francisco Superior Court judge rejected the team’s arguments in 2018. Their rulings were upheld in August by the state’s First District Court of Appeal, which said theWarrior­s had terminated their contract.

Although “terminate” can be interprete­d in different ways, theWarrior­s’ decision to depart the arena that the city and county had renovated for their benefit is reasonably understood as “terminatio­n by nonrenewal,” Presiding Justice Barbara Jones said in the 30 ruling.

She said the 1996 agreement included a “compromise” that allowed theWarrior­s to leave after 10 years if they paid the entire debt, or after 20 years if they made “debtservic­e payments less an offset until 2027.” That should be interprete­d to require payments even if the departure is allowed by the contract, Jones said.

TheWarrior­s appealed to the state Supreme Court, which denied review of the case without comment.

“While we are disappoint­ed in the Supreme Court’s decision to deny our petition, we will, as we’ve always indicated, pay the debt obligation in accordance with the ruling,” said team spokesman Raymond Ridder.

The case is OaklandAla­meda County Coliseum Authority vs. Golden StateWarri­ors, S264671.

 ?? Chris Stewart / The Chronicle 1997 ?? The Warriors must pay Oakland and Alameda County for constructi­on work on the arena they left when they moved to S. F. last year, after the state Supreme Court rejected the team’s appeal.
Chris Stewart / The Chronicle 1997 The Warriors must pay Oakland and Alameda County for constructi­on work on the arena they left when they moved to S. F. last year, after the state Supreme Court rejected the team’s appeal.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States