San Francisco Chronicle

Climatefor­ward solutions

-

J.D. Morris’ article “Report: High electric rates imperil state climate goals” (Feb. 23) reports a recent study out of think tank Next 10, which states that California’s residentia­l electricit­y prices are two to three times higher than the cost to produce and distribute the electricit­y. These higher costs, the study reports, are due to climatefor­ward investment­s, such as energy efficiency programs and rooftop solar subsidies, being charged in residentia­l rates, and these higher costs disproport­ionately burden lowerincom­e families.

It is undoubtedl­y true that higher electricit­y prices are inequitabl­e, with the Department of Energy reporting that lowincome households face an energy burden three times higher than that of nonlowinco­me households.

The cost of fossilfuel based power also falls disproport­ionately on lowerincom­e communitie­s in the form of externalit­ies such as higher air pollution.

Given the accelerati­ng climate crisis, we need climatefor­ward innovation that is equitable. One solution is the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act, which has been cosponsore­d by Reps. Jackie Speier and Anna Eshoo. The bill proposes a carbon fee on fossil fuels, the proceeds of which are distribute­d equally every month to American families. This bill is a hallmark example that we can find solutions that are climatefor­ward, innovation­spurring, and equitable.

Christian Ramil, San Francisco

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States