San Francisco Chronicle

Kill the filibuster and pass this bill

-

With the Republican Party broadly embracing election disinforma­tion, voter suppressio­n and minority rule, it falls to Democrats to bear the standard of democracy. Doing so will require them to finish off an antidemocr­atic tradition of a quasidemoc­ratic body, the Senate filibuster.

The House on Wednesday considered Democrats’ signature response to the party opposite’s authoritar­ian drift in the form of HR1, an omnibus of election, redistrict­ing and campaign finance reforms. Its fate and perhaps that of American democracy depend on the Democrats’ willingnes­s to use the majority they narrowly won in the Senate, where their 50 seats represent 41.5 million more Americans than the equivalent Republican caucus.

Democratic San Jose Rep. Zoe Lofgren, who chairs the House caucus with jurisdicti­on over the bill, noted the thwarted popular will for addressing climate change and raising the minimum wage in a news conference before the House vote. “Nothing else happens unless the people’s voices are heard,” she said.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, clutching a miniature American flag on the steps of the Capitol, agreed. “This reminds me of what it must have felt like at Valley Forge,” the San Francisco Democrat said. “Everything is at stake.”

It’s not much of an exaggerati­on. Pelosi and her fellow representa­tives stood at the scene of the violent insurrecti­on that delayed Congress’ certificat­ion of President Biden’s election just two months ago, while further security threats canceled a House session scheduled for Thursday. Though the mob that stormed the capital on Jan. 6 literally called for Mike Pence’s neck, the former vice president typified the party’s stance by embracing the false claims of election fraud that fueled the violence in an oped published Wednesday, joining former President Donald Trump in attacking HR1.

Republican­run state legislatur­es, meanwhile, already have begun moving bills to limit ballot access and suppress participat­ion. The party can also be counted on to oust several members of the House’s slim Democratic majority in two years not by persuading voters but through nakedly partisan gerrymande­ring, which already gives Republican­s an advantage over their vote share of as many as 22 seats, or twice the current Democratic advantage, according to an Associated Press analysis. A restoratio­n of Republican control of Congress could in turn mean that the next attempt to overturn certificat­ion of a legitimate presidenti­al election succeeds.

HR1 would stem this antidemocr­atic movement by setting national standards for ballot access, easing voter registrati­on nationwide, requiring early voting and prohibitin­g excessive barriers to voting by mail. It would also impose more transparen­cy on large political donations and create a matching system for small donations to congressio­nal campaigns. And it would mandate California­style independen­t redistrict­ing commission­s to prevent partisan gerrymande­ring.

While these measures would empower voters regardless of their politics, they are unlikely to draw much support from a party increasing­ly dedicated to voter suppressio­n and amenable to overturnin­g elections. That has turned attention to what remains of the filibuster, which effectivel­y requires 60 votes to pass most legislatio­n and would therefore doom HR1 in the Senate. Undoing that tradition would require the assent of the more conservati­veleaning Democrats such as West Virginia’s Joe Manchin, Arizona’s Kyrsten Sinema and California’s Dianne Feinstein, who have defended the filibuster. It’s time for these and other Democrats to live up to their label and defend democracy instead.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States