San Francisco Chronicle

Judge orders protest charges dropped

-

BEVERLY HILLS — Protesters who demonstrat­ed against racial injustice in Beverly Hills last summer must have criminal charges against them dismissed because the city’s emergency ordinance to arrest them was unconstitu­tional, a judge ruled.

The wealthy city’s decision to prosecute more than two dozen protesters, who had been part of demonstrat­ions nationwide to decry the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor by police, has been criticized for months.

Other Los Angelesare­a prosecutor­s have declined to move forward with cases against thousands of peaceful protesters. The judge ruled Friday, the Los Angeles Times reported.

Beverly Hills proclaimed a local emergency on May 30 and imposed nighttime curfews after demonstrat­ions spread to the city, which borders

Los Angeles and West Hollywood.

Two weeks later, the city barred noisy gatherings of more than 10 people after 9 p.m. to “preserve the peace and tranquilit­y of residentia­l neighborho­ods.” The penalty was a misdemeano­r charge punishable by up to 6 months in jail.

On June 26, the Black Future Project organized a largely peaceful protest that included around 75 people. About a third of them were arrested for violation of the ordinance.

The protesters were initially held on $5,000 bail — an amount that critics said was excessive — but were released the next day after the outcry.

Superior Court Judge Mark Windham ruled the ordinance violated people’s free speech. “Beverly Hills cannot prohibit legitimate­ly targeted disturbanc­es with a measure that equally prohibits innocent protected expression,” he wrote.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States