San Francisco Chronicle

Lofgren blasted over compilatio­n of internet posts

- By Tal Kopan Tal Kopan is The San Francisco Chronicle's Washingƒton correspond­ent. Email: tal.kopan@sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @talkopan

WASHINGTON — Republican­s are firing back at Rep. Zoe Lofgren over a compilatio­n she created of their social media posts related to the 2020 election and Jan. 6 insurrecti­on, filing a complaint against her that was made public Thursday.

The complaint is all but certain to be dismissed× the San Jose Democrat and chair of the House Administra­tion Committee maintains that her report was within House rules. But the escalation reveals how high tensions remain between Democrats and Republican­s as the GOP continues to spread baseless doubt over President Biden’s win over Donald Trump in the November election.

Georgia Rep. Buddy Carter filed the complaint last month with an arcane House commission, the Communicat­ions Standards Commission. That sixmember panel oversees what has historical­ly been known as the “franking” privilege — the ability to communicat­e with constituen­ts on the taxpayer’s dime, postage free. It has been renamed this year to incorporat­e digital communicat­ion.

At issue is Lofgren’s “social media review” of House Republican­s who voted to reject Electoral College results. The certificat­ion of those results was interrupte­d on Jan. 6 by a proTrump mob that breached the Capitol in a deadly insurrecti­on that sent lawmakers and former Vice President Mike Pence evacuating to safety. The compilatio­n of 1,900 pages of social media postings includes a foreword from Lofgren that suggests some GOP representa­tives may have “aided and abetted” the insurrecti­on.

Carter alleges that Lofgren abused official House communicat­ions to disparage colleagues and to link to political websites, which were contained within the public social media messages, including his, that she published.

Carter closed his complaint by alleging Lofgren was being divisive, including a reference to “cancel culture,” a term frequently used by conservati­ves to deride backlash to disagreeab­le viewpoints.

“It serves only to further divide the House at a time when we should all be committed to unity and healing,” Carter wrote. “It attempts to bring socalled 'cancel culture’ into the rightful debate between members of Congress.”

But Lofgren defended herself in a reply, saying that it is part of Congress’ duty to investigat­e any officehold­er’s potential role in an insurrecti­on.

“It is ironic that the complainan­t has accused me of somehow violating standards of civility and decorum by simply publishing other members’ own words,” Lofgren wrote.

The commission consists of three Democrats and three Republican­s, and a majority vote is required to sustain a complaint. In the event of a tie, the commission issues a finding of no violation, making it unlikely Lofgren will be found to have violated House rules.

 ?? Senate Television ãôãô ?? Rep. @oe ofgren, ŽSan ose, was hit with a complaint by House Republican­s after she compiled a report on their social media activity during and after the election and insurrecti­on.
Senate Television ãôãô Rep. @oe ofgren, ŽSan ose, was hit with a complaint by House Republican­s after she compiled a report on their social media activity during and after the election and insurrecti­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States