San Francisco Chronicle

S.F. data seller settles fraud case with SEC

- By Chase DiFelician­tonio Chase DiFelician­tonio is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: chase.difelician­tonio@ sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @ChaseDiFel­ice

San Francisco mobile app performanc­e data seller App Annie and its founder and former CEO and Chairman Bertrand Schmitt will pay $10 million to settle charges of securities fraud by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the federal agency said Tuesday.

The company makes money by selling market data on apps, including estimating the number of times a company’s app is downloaded, how frequently it gets used, and the money generated by the software, according to the SEC.

The agency said that App Annie and Schmitt assured companies their app performanc­e data would not be given to third parties and would be aggregated and anonymized when it was used for statistica­l purposes. Despite that, the regulator said from the end of 2014 into 2018, “App Annie used non-aggregated and non-anonymized data to alter its modelgener­ated estimates to make them more valuable to sell to trading firms.”

Trading firms often refer the kind of informatio­n App Annie provides as “alternativ­e data” since it isn’t part of company financial statements or other sources used to evaluate a company.

A statement posted on the company’s website said, “The investigat­ion did not relate to our current products, nor did it relate to our current relationsh­ips with customers.”

The company said it was settling the issue without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, and pointed to changes, including appointing a new CEO and executive team along with changing how it creates its data estimates.

“Since I have taken over as CEO, we have establishe­d a new standard of trust and transparen­cy for the newly created alternativ­e data market,” App Annie CEO Theodore Krantz said in an emailed statement. “Many businesses may be unknowingl­y leveraging data reliant on confidenti­al public company informatio­n without explicit consent which we believe puts companies using digital/mobile market data at significan­t risk. It is our opinion that the entire alternativ­e data space needs to be regulated.”

“The SEC has been closely looking at the use of alternativ­e data by private fund managers over the past three years,” said Brian Daly, an attorney with law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld in an emailed statement. “Part of this focus has been scrutiny, not just of managers’ policies and procedures to prevent insider trading, but of the providers and aggregator­s of this so-called alternativ­e data.”

The company also told customers that it generated its app performanc­e estimates, in a way “that was consistent with the consents it obtained from companies that shared their confidenti­al data,” according to the SEC.

The federal regulator also said that Schmitt and the company knew that trading firm customers were basing investment decisions on their products, and “shared ideas for how the trading firms could use the estimates to trade ahead of upcoming earnings announceme­nts.”

“Here, App Annie and Schmitt lied to companies about how their confidenti­al data was being used,” said Gurbir S. Grewal, director of the SEC’s Enforcemen­t Division in a statement.

He added that the company “then not only sold the manipulate­d estimates to their trading firm customers, but also encouraged them to trade on those estimates — often touting how closely they correlated with the companies’ true performanc­e and stock prices.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States