San Francisco Chronicle

Jury finds Heard libeled Depp; both actors awarded damages

- By Denise Lavoie Denise Lavoie is an Associated Press writer.

FAIRFAX, Va. — A jury awarded Johnny Depp more than $10 million on Wednesday in his libel lawsuit against ex-wife Amber Heard, vindicatin­g his stance that Heard fabricated claims that she was abused by Depp before and during their brief marriage.

The jury also found Heard was defamed by a lawyer for Depp who accused her of creating a detailed hoax that included roughing up their apartment to look worse for police. The jury awarded her $2 million in damages.

The verdicts bring an end to a televised trial that Depp had hoped would help restore his reputation, though it turned into a spectacle of a vicious marriage. Throughout the trial, fans — overwhelmi­ngly on Depp’s side — lined up overnight for coveted courtroom seats. Spectators who couldn’t get in gathered on the street to cheer Depp and jeer Heard whenever they appeared outside.

Heard, who was stoic in the courtroom as the verdict was read, said she was heartbroke­n.

“I’m even more disappoint­ed with what this verdict means for other women. It’s a setback. It sets back the clock to a time when a woman who spoke up and spoke out could be publicly humiliated. It sets back the idea that violence against women is to be taken seriously,” she said in a statement posted on her Twitter account.

Depp, who was not in court Wednesday, said “the jury gave me my life back. I am truly humbled.”

“I hope that my quest to have the truth be told will have helped others, men or women, who have found themselves in my situation, and that those supporting them never give up,” he said in a statement posted to Instagram.

Depp had sued Heard for libel in Fairfax County Circuit Court over a December 2018 opinion piece she wrote in the Washington Post describing herself as “a public figure representi­ng domestic abuse.” His lawyers said he was defamed by the article even though it never mentioned his name.

The jury found in Depp’s favor on all three of his claims relating to specific statements in the 2018 piece.

In evaluating Heard’s countercla­ims, jurors considered three statements by a lawyer for Depp who called her allegation­s a hoax. They found she was defamed by one of them, in which the lawyer claimed that she and friends “spilled a little wine and roughed the place up, got their stories straight,” and called police.

The case captivated millions through its gavel-to-gavel television coverage and impassione­d followers on social media who dissected everything from the actors’ mannerisms to the possible symbolism of what they were wearing. Both performers emerge from the trial with reputation­s in tatters and unclear prospects for their careers.

 ?? Brendan Smialowski / Pool / AFP / TNS ?? Amber Heard (left) and Johnny Depp appear in court in May. Both actors won damages in their libel suits against each other.
Brendan Smialowski / Pool / AFP / TNS Amber Heard (left) and Johnny Depp appear in court in May. Both actors won damages in their libel suits against each other.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States