San Francisco Chronicle

S.F. rejects resident’s plan to build housing

- By Roland Li Roland Li is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: roland.li@sfchronicl­e.com Twitter: @rolandlisf

“The city finds new and novel ways to break the law.” Scott Pluta, S.F. homeowner

A San Francisco resident who has been trying for years to build apartments in his yard sought on Wednesday to use the builder’s remedy clause under state law to win approval for a project.

But the city’s Planning Department said the builder’s remedy was not applicable for an apartment building at 4300 17th St., because the state certified San Francisco’s Housing Element Plan earlier in the day. That means the builder’s remedy, which would allow projects with a certain number of affordable units to bypass local restrictio­ns, was not valid.

Though San Francisco narrowly avoided being out of compliance with state law, the majority of Bay Area cities have not won approval for their housing elements, which are plans for how local housing stocks will grow over an eight-year period.

The ramificati­ons are uncertain, but could trigger developers to seek the builder’s remedy in other municipali­ties.

The San Francisco proposal at 4300 17th St. in Corona Heights has already been contentiou­s. Property owner Scott Pluta sued the city last year after it rejected his proposal for four apartment units, two of them affordable.

Pluta said on Tuesday that he had “mixed emotions.” On one hand, he was pleased that the city had a plan to add 82,000 units over the next eight years.

“I’m of course disappoint­ed,” he said. “I was surprised that the state threw the city a lifeline.”

The state is also investigat­ing San Francisco’s lengthy and complex housing approval process in the first review of its kind.

Pluta, who works as an attorney for Google and was a staffer in the Obama administra­tion, said he believes the city continues to violate state housing laws.

“The city finds new and novel ways to break the law,” he said.

Pluta said he has run into obstacles while converting the ground-floor garage of his building into an accessory dwelling unit.

The city wants him to install a sprinkler that he said would cost $100,000, but Pluta said state laws say a sprinkler is not necessary.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, who was formerly a San Francisco mayor, hailed the city’s Housing Element on Tuesday.

“Today’s announceme­nt demonstrat­es our commitment to tackling this housing crisis headon by providing unpreceden­ted funding and resources, streamlini­ng and eliminatin­g bureaucrat­ic red tape and, most importantl­y, demanding greater accountabi­lity at the local level,” he said in a statement.

Pluta plans to continue his litigation against the city and his efforts to build the apartments in what he described as “World War I trench-style battle.”

 ?? Salgu Wissmath/The Chronicle 2022 ?? Homeowner Scott Pluta has been trying for years to build four apartments, two affordable, on his property. His recent bid to use builder’s remedy was shot down.
Salgu Wissmath/The Chronicle 2022 Homeowner Scott Pluta has been trying for years to build four apartments, two affordable, on his property. His recent bid to use builder’s remedy was shot down.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States