San Francisco Chronicle

Don’t blame Sunol school board for flag debate

-

Regarding “Why removing Sunol school board members Hurley and Jergenson is the right thing to do” (Letters to the Editor, SFChronicl­e.com, Nov. 21): The author states that “removing Trustees Hurley (me) and Jergenson from office will restore our beautiful Sunol Glen community” all because the Sunol school board voted to fly only the U.S. and California flags that state Government Code 431 requires.

Sunol school board members are not the ones who “have turned meetings into a public theater for private agendas.”

The controvers­y began when the Sunol Glen School superinten­dent removed the California flag without board approval and replaced it with an LGBTQ+ Progress Pride flag.

Local citizens complained and one formally requested a different specialint­erest flag be flown.

This precipitat­ed our decision. Discussion­s have remained open at board meetings, although Alameda County Sheriff ’s deputies were summoned on Sept. 12 when proceeding­s became disorderly.

Regarding AB1314: Asking for a discussion about informing parents about their child’s dysphoria (unhappines­s, depression) is not anti-LGBTQ.

The recent Mirabelli lawsuit decision in favor of parental notificati­on rights is a new factor; teachers and schools have been caught in the crossfire of legal struggles.

I will continue to protect the district against legal action and work to keep Sunol Glen School politicall­y neutral and to obey the law and our policies, including those that prohibit pornograph­y along with those that require that “instructio­n shall be presented in a balanced manner.” Linda Hurley, member, Sunol Glen Unified School District Board Trustees

 ?? Jack Ohman/Tribune Content Agency ??
Jack Ohman/Tribune Content Agency

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States