Site plan could change after racist incident involving Utah

The NCAA women’s basketball tournament has so far been the most successful it has ever been when it comes to viewership and attendance, driven by crowds flocking to see their teams play firstand second-round games at home in hopes of advancing to the Sweet 16.

An ugly incident involving the Utah women’s basketball team last week has raised questions about how the NCAA selects those early-round sites.

The Utes players and their traveling party faced racism near their hotel in Idaho and ultimately changed locations. The team was staying in Idaho, 30 miles away from their game site, because of lack of hotel availability in Spokane, Wash.

NCAA Vice President for Women’s Basketball Lynn Holzman spoke with the Associated Press about the logistics and whether changes could be in store.

Why are the first two rounds played at campus sites?

The NCAA has tried a few different formats for the opening rounds of the tournament, and the most successful has been the current one where the top 16 seeds host games. The NCAA went to that format in 2015 after having predetermined sites at schools for the first two rounds before that.

“Home sites are a great reward for teams that have earned them throughout the season, and the prospect of hosting really ignites the local fan bases as they try and earn the host site,” said North Carolina coach Courtney Banghart, who is president of the Women’s Basketball Coaches Association. “But, this is only true if the seeding all the way through the 64 is right, based on the team and its qualifications, and never on geographical location.”

This year, there was a record 292,456 fans in attendance for the first two rounds, shattering the previous mark by over 60,000 set last season.

Would the NCAA consider changing site selection?

Holzman told the AP that the selection committee was slated to review the championship format after the 2025 tournament. She has been pushing for some time to move the review up to this year.

“That review would include the First Four, first and second rounds and also an evaluation of the two-site regional format,” Holzman said. “We want to look at the preliminary rounds of the championship, and with the growth we’ve had the last few years, I think we should move up that review to start in 2024.”

Can the women’s early round sites be locked in earlier?

Holzman said the bid process to host the opening two rounds starts in July and goes into the fall. This past year, 40 schools were considered, with an eye toward which teams could crack the top 16 seeds chosen by the NCAA selection committee.

“Teams drop off on their own accord,” she said. “When we get into Selection Sunday, there are 20-25 bids that are completely ready and sitting there in case they get the top seed. This year we had 27 that we were ready to act on.”