Santa Cruz Sentinel

Proposed US resolution would back efforts for a cease-fire in Gaza

- By Edith M. Lederer

>> The United States circulated the final draft of a United Nations Security Council resolution late Thursday that would support internatio­nal efforts to establish “an immediate and sustained cease-fire” in the Israel-Hamas war as part of a deal to release hostages taken captive during Hamas' surprise attack on southern Israel on Oct. 7.

No time has been set for a vote, and the draft, obtained by The Associated Press, could still be changed.

The U.S. circulated the initial draft on Feb. 19, a day before it vetoed a widely supported Arabbacked resolution demanding an immediate humanitari­an cease-fire in the war in the embattled Gaza Strip, saying it would interfere with negotiatio­ns on a deal to free the hostages.

It was the third U.S. veto of a Security Council resolution demanding a ceasefire in Gaza, and has put President Joe Biden's administra­tion at odds with much of the world, including many allies.

Diplomatic talks have stalled since efforts failed to produce a cease-fire before the start of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan — an informal deadline that passed without any agreement.

The Israeli military said Wednesday it will go ahead with its planned offensive in the southern city of Rafah — where 1.4 million displaced Palestinia­ns have sought safety — and plans to move civilians toward “humanitari­an islands” in the center of the territory.

The U.S. draft put “in blue” late Thursday — meaning it is in a form that can be voted on — is the fifth version of the text and makes some key changes.

The initial draft would have underscore­d that a temporary cease-fire “as soon as practicabl­e” required the release of all hostages, and called for the lifting of all restrictio­ns on the delivery of humanitari­an aid. Both of these actions “would help to create the conditions for a sustainabl­e cessation of hostilitie­s,” it said.

The final draft “unequivoca­lly supports internatio­nal diplomatic efforts to establish an immediate and sustained cease-fire as part of a deal that releases the hostages, and that allows the basis for a more durable peace to alleviate humanitari­an suffering” — eliminatin­g the word “temporary.”

It also says that “the window of opportunit­y created by any cease-fire” should be used to intensify diplomatic efforts to create conditions “for a sustainabl­e cessation of hostilitie­s and lasting peace.”

The initial draft said Israel's planned major ground offensive into the southern Gaza city of Rafah “should not proceed under current circumstan­ces.” That language disappeare­d in the final draft. Instead, in an introducto­ry paragraph, the council would emphasize its concern that a ground offensive into Rafah “would result in further harm to civilians and their further displaceme­nt, potentiall­y into neighborin­g countries, and would have serious implicatio­ns for regional peace and security.”

The final draft “rejects any forced displaceme­nt of the civilian population in Gaza in violation of internatio­nal law.”

Since Oct. 7, more than 31,000 Palestinia­ns have been killed in the Israeli offensive, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguis­h between civilians and combatants but says about two-thirds of the victims were women and children.

The U.S. draft would demand that all parties comply with internatio­nal law requiring protection of civilians and “civilian objects,” which include hospitals, schools and homes. The draft would also express the council's “deep concern about the threat of conflict-inducted famine and epidemics presently facing the civilian population in Gaza, as well as the number of undernouri­shed people,” and the “catastroph­ic” levels of hunger.

The council would reiterate its demand for “the full, immediate, safe, sustained and unhindered delivery of humanitari­an assistance at scale directly to the Palestinia­n civilian population throughout the Gaza Strip.” The draft says this should be facilitate­d by using all available routes, including border crossings.

If the resolution is approved, it would for the first time condemn “the Hamas-led attacks of Oct. 7, 2023, as well as its taking and killing of hostages, murder of civilians, and sexual violence including rape” and condemn “its use of civilian infrastruc­ture for military purposes and to hold hostages.” It would also demand that Hamas and other armed groups immediatel­y grant humanitari­an access to all remaining hostages.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States