Santa Fe New Mexican

Worry about health care bill in Senate

- David Leonhardt is an American journalist and columnist. Since 2014, he has been the managing editor of The Upshot at The New York Times that focuses on politics, policy and economics. DAVID LEONHARDT

While the rest of the country has been transfixed by Trumpian chaos, members of the Senate have spent the past two weeks talking about taking health insurance from millions of Americans.

There is an alarmingly large chance that they’ll decide to do so. But if they do, they will almost certainly rely on a political sleight of hand to disguise their bill’s damage. Understand­ing that sleight of hand — and calling attention to it — offers the best hope for defeating the bill.

The effort to take health insurance from the middle class and poor and funnel the savings into tax cuts for the rich is a little like mold. It grows best in the dark.

That’s why Republican leaders in the House handled their bill as they did. They did not hold a single hearing, because they knew that attention would have been devastatin­g.

Just imagine a hearing featuring the leaders of these groups, every one of which opposes the House bill: the American Medical Associatio­n, American Nurses Associatio­n, American Hospital Associatio­n, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Cancer Society, American Heart Associatio­n, American Diabetes Associatio­n, American Lung Associatio­n, March of Dimes and AARP.

The House also passed its final bill without waiting for the Congressio­nal Budget Office to estimate how many Americans would lose insurance. The CBO will release that analysis tomorrow afternoon. There is no precedent, outside of wartime, for passing a bill this important in such haste.

After the House did, many observers assumed the bill was too flawed to have much chance in the Senate. Republican senators, aware of the bill’s unpopulari­ty, were careful to say publicly that they would start fresh. But the early signs suggest that Mitch McConnell and his Republican caucus are actually mimicking the House approach. Think of it as the Upton strategy, and I’ll explain the name in a minute.

It starts with avoiding public discussion. As Politico reported: “McConnell’s strategy is to keep the debate within his conference for as long as possible. There will be no public hearings as a bill is drafted, according to several Republican senators and aides, and he’s imploring senators not to leak.”

The Democrats’ process for passing the Affordable Care Act in 2008-10 was certainly not perfect. But it was radically more open than this process, including 44 hearings and other public events in the Senate alone. Republican­s, by contrast, have invited select people to send feedback to an email address — HealthRefo­rm@finance.senate.gov — no later than today. (I encourage you to send your own email!) If secrecy is the first part of the strategy, distractio­n is the second. Eventually, before a vote is taken, the details of the Senate bill will become public, as they did in the House. And those details will include a long list of problems.

Here’s where we get to the Upton maneuver. The House managed to pass its bill only after Fred Upton, R-Mich., offered a proposal purporting to fix one of the bill’s highest-profile problems, related to preexistin­g conditions.

Never mind that the proposal was only a superficia­l improvemen­t. Never mind that the full bill was still opposed by conservati­ve, moderate and liberal health care experts. Upton’s proposal allowed House members to claim they had “fixed” their bill. It gave them an excuse to vote yes.

Watch for similar moving of the goal posts in the Senate. There, Republican leaders are likely to brag about the ways they have improved the House bill or early versions of their own bill. They will also point to problems in insurance markets, some of which President Donald Trump is deliberate­ly creating, as reason to do something.

But these are the wrong standards. The right standard is whether the bill improves the health care system. A bill that takes away health insurance from 15 million, 10 million or 1 million Americans — rather than the 20 million or so of the House bill — still deserves defeat. The final part of the strategy will be arm-twisting. If victory is in sight, McConnell will invoke party loyalty to cajole his colleagues, whatever specific concerns some may have. Being the Republican who brought down the American Health Care Act, or “Trumpcare,” wouldn’t be fun.

So the current period is important. It’s a time for all those groups that oppose the bill, and for the engaged progressiv­e base, to put senators on notice. They shouldn’t be tinkering around the edges of a bill that would hurt the middle class and the poor, the sick and elderly, children and the disabled. They won’t get credit for making it marginally less cruel.

A small group of Senate Republican­s has shown signs of being persuadabl­e, and only three are likely needed to stop a bill. The group includes Lamar Alexander, Shelley Moore Capito, Bill Cassidy, Susan Collins, Dean Heller, Lisa Murkowski and Rob Portman.

They should hear a loud message that Americans aren’t in favor of taking health insurance from their fellow citizens. The senators work for those citizens, not for Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan and Donald Trump.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States