Santa Fe New Mexican

Clearing the way

‘Snowplow’ parents try to ensure their child doesn’t face adversity, but experts say this can lead to problems in the future

- By Claire Cain Miller and Jonah Engel Bromwich

Nicole Eisenberg’s older son has wanted to be a star of the stage since he was a toddler, she said. He took voice, dance and drama lessons and attended the renowned Stagedoor Manor summer camp for half a dozen years, but she was anxious that might not be enough to get him into the best performing arts programs.

So Eisenberg and others in Bloomfield Hills, Mich., the affluent suburb where she lives, helped him start a charity with friends that raised more than $250,000 over four years.

“The moms — the four or five moms that started it together — we started it, we helped, but we did not do it for them,” she recalled. “Did we ask for sponsors for them? Yes. Did we ask for money for them? Yes. But they had to do the work.”

She even considered a donation to the college of his choice. “There’s no amount of money we could have paid to have got him in,” Eisenberg, 49, said. “Because, trust me, my father-in-law asked.” Her son was admitted to two of the best musical theater programs in the country, along with nine more of the 26 schools he applied to, she said.

College has been on their radar since her son was in diapers. “We’ve been working on this since he was 3 years old,” she said. To apply, she said: “I had to take him on 20 auditions for musical theater. But he did it with me. I don’t feel like I did this. I supported him in it. I did not helicopter parent him. I was a co-pilot.” Or was she, perhaps, a snowplow parent? Helicopter parenting, the practice of hovering anxiously near one’s children, monitoring their every activity, is so 20th century. Some affluent mothers and fathers now are more like snowplows: machines chugging ahead, clearing any obstacles in their child’s path to success so they don’t have to encounter failure, frustratio­n or lost opportunit­ies.

Taken to its criminal extreme, that means bribing SAT proctors and paying off college coaches to get children into elite colleges — and then going to great lengths to make sure they never face the humiliatio­n of knowing how they got there.

Those are among the allegation­s in the recent college bribery scandal, in which 50 people were charged in a wide-ranging fraud to secure students admissions to colleges. According to the investigat­ion, one parent lied about his son playing water polo, but then worried that the child would be perceived by his peers as “a bench warmer side door person.” He was assured that his son wouldn’t have to actually be on the team. Another, the charges said, paid someone to take the ACT for her son — and then pretended to proctor it for him herself, at home, so he would think he was the test-taker.

The parents charged in this investigat­ion, code-named Operation Varsity Blues, are far outside the norm. But they were acting as the ultimate snowplows: clearing the way for their children to get in to college, while shielding them from any of the difficulty, risk and potential disappoint­ment of the process.

In its less outrageous — and wholly legal — form, snowplowin­g — also known as lawnmowing and bulldozing — has become the most brazen mode of parenting of privileged children.

It starts early, when parents get on wait lists for elite preschools before their babies are born and try to make sure their toddlers are never compelled to do anything that may frustrate them. It gets more intense when school starts: running a forgotten assignment to school or calling a coach to request that their child make the team.

Later, it’s writing them an excuse if they procrastin­ate on schoolwork, paying a college counselor thousands of dollars to perfect their applicatio­ns or calling their professors to argue about a grade.

The bribery scandal has “just highlighte­d an incredibly dark side of what has become normative, which is making sure that your kid has the best, is exposed to the best, has every advantage — without understand­ing how disabling that can be,” said Madeline Levine, a psychologi­st and the author of Teach Your Children Well: Why Values and Coping Skills Matter More Than Grades, Trophies or ‘Fat Envelopes.’ “They’ve cleared everything out of their kids’ way,” she said.

In her practice, Levine said, she regularly sees college freshmen who “have had to come home from Emory or Brown because they don’t have the minimal kinds of adult skills that one needs to be in college.”

One came home because there was a rat in the dorm room. Some didn’t like their roommates. Others said it was too much work, and they had never learned independen­t study skills. One didn’t like to eat food with sauce. Her whole life, her parents had helped her avoid sauce, calling friends before going to their houses for dinner. At college, she didn’t know how to cope with the cafeteria options — covered in sauce.

“Here are parents who have spent 18 years grooming their kids with what they perceive as advantages, but they’re not,” Levine said.

Yes, it’s a parent’s job to support the children, and to use their adult wisdom to prepare for the future when their children aren’t mature enough to do so. That’s why parents hide certain toys from toddlers to avoid temper tantrums or take away a teenager’s car keys until they finish their college applicatio­ns.

But snowplow parents can take it too far, some experts say. If children have never faced an obstacle, what happens when they get into the real world?

They flounder, said Julie Lythcott-Haims, the former dean of freshmen at Stanford

University and the author of How to Raise an Adult: Break Free of the Overparent­ing Trap and Prepare Your Kid for Success.

At Stanford, she said, she saw students rely on their parents to set up play dates with people in their dorm or complain to their child’s employers when an internship didn’t lead to a job. The root cause, she said, was parents who had never let their children face challenges.

Snowplow parents have it backward, Lythcott-Haims said: “The point is to prepare the kid for the road, instead of preparing the road for the kid.”

“There’s a constant monitoring of where their kid is and what they are doing, all with the intent of preventing something happening and becoming a barrier to the child’s success,” said Laura Hamilton, author of Parenting to a Degree: How Family Matters for College and

Beyond and a sociologis­t at the University of California, Merced.

The destinatio­n at the end of the road is often admission to college. For many wealthy families, it has always been a necessary badge of accomplish­ment for the child — and for the parents. A college degree has also become increasing­ly essential to earning a middle-class wage.

But college admissions have become more competitiv­e. The number of applicants has doubled since the 1970s, and the growth in the number of spots has not kept pace.

At the same time, it’s no longer guaranteed that children will do as well as their parents. Children born in 1950 had an 80 percent chance of making more money than their parents, according to work by a team of economists led by Raj Chetty at Harvard University. Those born in 1970 had a 61 percent chance. But since 1980, children are as likely as not to earn less than their parents did.

“Increasing­ly, it appears any mistake could be fatal for their class outcome,” said Philip Cohen, a sociologis­t studying parenting and inequality at the University of Maryland.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States