Santa Fe New Mexican

Buyback talk: How do you round up guns?

- By Lisa Marie Pane

Democratic presidenti­al candidate Beto O’Rourke’s recent vow to take away people’s AR-15 and AK-47 rifles raised a big question: How is it possible to round up the millions of such guns that exist in the United States?

The number of AR-15s and AK-47s in the U.S. is estimated at a staggering 16 million, creating logistical challenges to take them out of circulatio­n. Many gun owners are also unwilling to turn over the weapons, and if the government offered to buy them all back at face value, the price tag could easily run into the billions of dollars.

O’Rourke’s pointed declaratio­n during a recent debate — “Hell yes, we’re gonna take your AR-15, your AK-47” — stoked longstandi­ng fears among gun owners that Democrats want to confiscate guns. Even some gun-control advocates aren’t so sure that confiscati­ng firearms will work.

“In some regards, this horse is out of the barn,” said David Chipman, a retired agent with the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and now the senior policy adviser for the Giffords group. “For years, we’ve allowed these to be sold.”

O’Rourke’s remarks came in the wake of several high-profile shootings, including two in his home state of Texas that involved AR- or AK-style guns, which resemble military-style weapons and generally carry more rounds than regular rifles. A summer of carnage was marked by shootings in Gilroy, Calif.; El Paso; Dayton, Ohio; and in a 10-mile stretch between Midland and Odessa, Texas. In all, more than 40 people were killed and about 100 were wounded in the attacks.

O’Rourke believes that most people would follow the law and turn their weapons in under his proposal for a mandatory buyback program and assault weapons ban. He also wants to outlaw high-capacity magazines and expand background checks.

Cory Booker has proposed a similar program that would involve civil penalties for those who fail to comply and hand in their AR-15s. They would not be subject to criminal offenses, however.

There is a precedent for the ideas proposed by O’Rourke and Booker, as difficult as they would be to implement.

The Trump administra­tion recently banned bump stocks — devices that allow semiautoma­tic long guns to mimic fully automatic fire — and ordered owners to turn them in to be destroyed. But there were only about a half-million of those devices, and they cost far less than an AR, which can run upwards of $1,000 or more. The ban was largely based on an honor system, though Washington state did offer a buyback program that quickly exhausted the $150,000 set aside to shell out $150 for each device turned in.

 ?? ROBERT F. BUKATY/ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Democratic presidenti­al candidate Beto O’Rourke speaks during the New Hampshire state Democratic Party convention in Manchester, N.H. O’Rourke’s call to confiscate the millions of AR- and AK-style firearms in the U.S. raised some big questions. How might it be possible to round up all the millions of those rifles in circulatio­n? Could it be done safely? And would it solve the gun violence problem?
ROBERT F. BUKATY/ASSOCIATED PRESS Democratic presidenti­al candidate Beto O’Rourke speaks during the New Hampshire state Democratic Party convention in Manchester, N.H. O’Rourke’s call to confiscate the millions of AR- and AK-style firearms in the U.S. raised some big questions. How might it be possible to round up all the millions of those rifles in circulatio­n? Could it be done safely? And would it solve the gun violence problem?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States