Santa Fe New Mexican

State misses deadlines on $5M for recreation projects

Lack of staffing, bureaucrat­ic issues, missteps are blamed

- By Elizabeth Miller

Money is just flying out of our hands. I can’t contain the anxiety I feel about that and how that money could have gone to communitie­s.”

New Mexico has forfeited more than $5 million in federal funding for outdoor recreation projects over the last three years because employees at New Mexico’s State Parks Division missed deadlines to distribute the money to projects around the state.

The money is the state’s share of the Land and Water Conservati­on Fund, a 5-decades-old federal program that funnels revenue largely from offshore oil and gas leases to outdoor recreation and land conservati­on efforts. The fund supports several programs, including one in which communitie­s and tribes around the nation can apply for up to $250,000 each.

Roadblocks to distributi­ng the funds, state staff say, included lack of staffing, a maze of bureaucrat­ic requiremen­ts and simple missteps, like neglecting to update an email address online. Grant applicatio­ns for those funds filed by New Mexico communitie­s two years ago still await submission for federal approval.

“Money is just flying out of our hands,” Rep. Kristina Ortez, D-Taos, said at a Water and Natural Resources Committee meeting in November at which state lawmakers were briefed on the lost funds. “I can’t contain the anxiety I feel about that and how that money could have gone to communitie­s.”

Robert Stokes, chief of the Program Support Bureau at the State Parks Division and currently covering the job of Land and Water Conservati­on Fund program coordinato­r, blamed a lack of employees. The work was “a big task for just one person,” he said during the committee meeting.

Since 1965, federal dollars have funded 1,200 projects in New Mexico, building trails, acquiring land and improving city parks. But the State Parks Division, which administer­s the grants, has not supported any community-based projects since 2005, when money went to a swimming pool in Lovington. Instead, New Mexico’s allocation since then has gone to state parks: building campsites, picnic tables, footpaths, bathrooms and water systems.

The State Parks Division says the Land and Water Conservati­on Fund’s erratic history led it to stop running a community grant program. Congress used to dictate how much the national fund received each year and underfunde­d it for years. The share for state and local assistance grants heading to New Mexico dwindled to less than $500,000 annually for a few years. So State Parks decided to use the money rather than call for community grant applicatio­ns, Stokes said.

However, the agency focused on state park maintenanc­e rather than community projects even in years when the funding increased to $1 million or more. Stokes declined to comment on that decision, which preceded his arrival at the division.

The financial stakes really shifted in 2020 when, amid great public fanfare, Congress committed $900 million annually to the Land and Water Conservati­on Fund so long as revenues kept it fully funded at that amount. New Mexico’s share of the

$900 million for local grants worked out to about $2.5 million per year. The National Park Service also required states to appoint a dedicated administra­tor, which New Mexico did in late 2020 and called for grant applicatio­ns in late 2021.

“It did take a while for the state to be able to get all of those pieces in position that are required … to start moving forward with the applicatio­n process,” Stokes said.

But State Parks already lagged behind. The National Park Service makes money available for up to three fiscal years. After that time, any portion not dedicated to an approved project reverts to a federal contingenc­y fund spent at the Interior secretary’s discretion.

New Mexico lost access to nearly $1 million of the

$1.9 million awarded in 2019, and then most of the $2.5 million allocated in 2020, according to documents obtained in response to a public records request.

Stokes told lawmakers during the November hearing New Mexico lost another $2.1 million in 2023 but was likely to get those dollars back. The National Park Service’s Land and Water Conservati­on Fund regional program manager told New Mexico In Depth that might not be possible.

“There were state parks projects that were occurring and they did use up some of that money that was set to expire, but not the totality of it,” Stokes said. “And before the first open applicatio­n period was announced in late 2021, we didn’t have community applicatio­ns either to potentiall­y use some of that money.”

But 11 communitie­s and two tribes submitted applicatio­ns for funding by the end of 2021. Another 14 communitie­s applied in 2022. The news release announcing that call for proposals erroneousl­y stated 13 projects the previous year had been awarded $2.5 million. In reality, those applicatio­ns have not been submitted for federal approval yet.

The delays worry Kay Bounkeua, New Mexico deputy director for The Wilderness Society, an environmen­tal organizati­on that campaigned for full federal funding and then encouraged communitie­s to apply.

“People will be like, ‘Well I’m not going to apply for that. I did once and didn’t hear for five years,’ ” Bounkeua said. “There’s a lot of other issues that are going to come out of this because of the struggles of standing this program up.”

In 2021, Luna County applied for $250,000 to build batting cages as part of a growing recreation center in downtown Deming. The county applied again in 2022 for basketball courts, said Bryan Reedy, the county’s grants and projects director, but “I’ve given up on that one.”

The dirt has been leveled and ready for a while. But Reedy said he’d rather tap other funding and move on than continue chasing a string of requests for more informatio­n about this grant, the latest of which asked for details he’d submitted in previous emails.

“I have no trust in even waiting for them — I’ve got to get this project done,” Reedy said. “We’ll be done with the project before they tell us if we’ve been accepted or not.”

Meanwhile, rising prices downsized the county plan from six to five batting cages. It might shrink again. Between the emailed clarificat­ions and modificati­ons as the project has evolved over two years, he said, “We’ve rewritten this grant like three times. It’s frustratin­g.”

The pueblos of Acoma and Santa Clara both applied for funding in 2021, the first for an outdoor recreation center, and the second for picnic areas, restroom facilities and day-use cabins to replace a campground destroyed by the Las Conchas Fire in 2011. If awarded, those tribal-led projects would be the first in New Mexico to receive Land and Water Conservati­on Fund support since 1989.

Santa Clara Pueblo has worked for a decade to restore the ecology of Santa Clara Canyon after the wildfire, said Garrett Altmann, a coordinato­r and project manager for the tribe. This grant marked a first move toward recovering recreation­al spaces that allow people to reconnect with that landscape. The tribe has secured millions in other federal support since that wildfire, but this process is more cumbersome, requiring detailed estimates that are difficult to provide.

“Now we’re like, is it worth $200,000 to go through all this?” he said.

The process includes internal reviews and state parks staff transferri­ng applicatio­ns onto paperwork for the National Park Service, which can total more than 20 forms.

At this point, five communitie­s have withdrawn their 2021 applicatio­ns, citing reasons like insufficie­nt matching funds. The Land and Water Conservati­on Fund requires communitie­s identify other sources for 50% of the project cost.

In 1973, the state created and allocated the equivalent of millions in 2022 dollars to a supplement­al fund for that matching requiremen­t, but lawmakers haven’t deposited money into it since 1994, according to an analysis by Western Resource Advocates.

“I had reached out to folks at state parks on when the last time money was appropriat­ed [to that fund],” said Jonathan Hayden, a senior policy adviser with Western Resource Advocates. “They didn’t even know it existed.”

Hayden is working with Sen. Mimi Stewart, D-Albuquerqu­e, on a bill to address some of the program’s issues, including directing money to that fund. The changes might also allow the state to spend some of that financial support on outreach and administra­tive time and training, including technical support for rural communitie­s, and perhaps ease some eligibilit­y requiremen­ts so more communitie­s qualify.

“Because we already have the fund, because we have experience using it and because it’s really designed to help rural areas of the state, I just think this could be a real benefit,” Stewart said.

The eight applicatio­ns remaining from 2021 were ready to submit in July. But the state had changed its email address format, and no one had updated the federal web portal for uploading applicatio­ns. State staff didn’t recognize the problem until they tried to submit documents, and were unable to log in until after the deadline. Those applicatio­ns may finally be submitted in January, and New Mexico does have funds remaining to cover their requests.

Staff are now starting on the federal forms for applicatio­ns from 2022.

Requests for additional informatio­n, from a missed signature that takes mere minutes to correct to more exhaustive environmen­tal inquiries, are common, according to the National Park Service’s Land and Water Conservati­on Fund regional program manager. It’s also not unheard of for a state to leave some money unspent, but losing millions is “unusual.”

The state’s Land and Water Conservati­on Fund program coordinato­r position — the full-time employee dedicated to administer­ing these grants — has been vacant since October. Stokes anticipate­s a new full-time program coordinato­r starting in January and perhaps, eventually, a second employee or interns. Even without a program coordinato­r, the state issued another call for grants this fall, with applicatio­ns due at the end of December.

Rep. Kristina Ortez, D-Taos, at a Water and Natural Resources Committee meeting in November

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States