Santa Fe New Mexican

Smithsonia­n task force: Return human remains

Museum urged to streamline process for Native peoples and to begin effort that includes other groups not mandated by federal law

- By Nicole Dungca and Claire Healy

The remains of tens of thousands of individual­s taken by the Smithsonia­n Institutio­n without consent should be proactivel­y returned to their families and communitie­s, a task force convened by the world-renowned museum complex has concluded.

If adopted into policy, the recommenda­tions outlined by the 15-person task force would represent a historic shift for the Smithsonia­n, significan­tly broadening its repatriati­on efforts.

The recommenda­tions, released Wednesday, follow a Washington Post investigat­ion that revealed the Smithsonia­n National Museum of Natural History holds more than 30,700 sets of human remains, largely taken from graveyards, battlefiel­ds, morgues and hospitals in more than 80 countries in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The collection includes 254 human brains housed in a storage facility in suburban Maryland, most of them taken from people of color to further now-debunked theories on racial difference­s.

While the Smithsonia­n is mandated under a 1989 federal law to offer to return the remains of Native American, Native Hawaiian and Alaska Native people to their descendant­s and communitie­s, the legislatio­n is silent on all other remains, leaving thousands of body parts in limbo.

But in Wednesday’s report, the task force proposed that the Natural History Museum establish a new staff that would be responsibl­e for returning remains that are not covered by the federal law — a policy experts say could prompt other museums worldwide to follow suit. The report also recommende­d streamlini­ng the process for returning Native American remains and providing additional funding for that effort.

The task force — made up of Smithsonia­n officials and outside experts — called the collection an “unfortunat­e inheritanc­e, a racist legacy that burdens the Smithsonia­n and prolongs this injustice.”

“While much of this collecting of human remains was done by curators and individual­s long dead, it occurred at the Smithsonia­n and relied on the Smithsonia­n’s resources, reputation, and influence,” the task force wrote. “The original intent of collecting these human remains was morally abhorrent, because it sought to prove the superiorit­y of white people and their descendant­s to Native Americans, African Americans, and others through scientific means that are now thoroughly discredite­d.” Officials said the policies laid out in the report could be adopted by this fall. Kevin Gover, a co-chair of the task force and the Smithsonia­n’s undersecre­tary for museums and culture, said the report reflected a drastic change in the way the Smithsonia­n has grappled with human remains that were collected during a different era.

“We inherit what our predecesso­rs did at the Smithsonia­n, and that means we also inherit the obligation to doing what we can to put things right,” said Gover, a former director of the Smithsonia­n’s National Museum of the American Indian and a citizen of the Pawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. “This institutio­n is now 177 years old, and like any institutio­n of that age, we have a lot to answer for on matters of race,” he added.

The Post last year examined the grisly legacy of Ales Hrdlicka, who led the physical anthropolo­gy department at the U.S. National Museum, the precursor to the Natural History Museum, for most of the first half of the 20th century. Hrdlicka believed in white superiorit­y and amassed thousands of bones and other body parts at the museum to further his theories on the anatomical difference­s between races.

The Post found the museum had failed to return the vast majority of human remains in its possession, and that families and communitie­s were required to formally petition for their return, even though many had no idea they had relatives with remains in the collection. As of December, museum officials had returned or offered to return more than 6,300 sets of human remains — the vast majority belonging to Native Americans, as required by federal law.

In response to the Post’s reporting, Lonnie G. Bunch III, the Smithsonia­n’s secretary, published an op-ed apologizin­g for the way the institutio­n had collected human remains and said his goal was to return as many remains as possible.

According to the new report, around half of the individual­s whose remains are still stored by the Smithsonia­n are Native American and 2,100 are African American. Almost 6,000 of the individual­s are named, “either in full, partly, or by their initials.”

 ?? SALWAN GEORGES/WASHINGTON POST FILE PHOTO ?? Rachel Twitchell-Justiss, left, and Martha Sara Jack place the brain of their relative Mary Sara, a young Sami woman who died of tuberculos­is in Alaska in 1933, into a grave in August after the Smithsonia­n Institutio­n returned it to their family.
SALWAN GEORGES/WASHINGTON POST FILE PHOTO Rachel Twitchell-Justiss, left, and Martha Sara Jack place the brain of their relative Mary Sara, a young Sami woman who died of tuberculos­is in Alaska in 1933, into a grave in August after the Smithsonia­n Institutio­n returned it to their family.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States