Santa Fe New Mexican

Fossil fuel ‘produced water’: Keep it out of waterways

- Rachel Conn is deputy director of Amigos Bravos. Erik Schlenker-Goodrich is executive director of the Western Environmen­tal Law Center. Dale Doremus is former water chair at the Sierra Club Rio Grande Chapter.

There is intense and well-founded concern regarding the treatment and reuse of wastewater — known as “produced water” — created as a byproduct of oil and gas production. Fortunatel­y, on Monday, New Mexico’s Water Quality Control Commission will begin a multiday hearing to consider a rule proposed by the New Mexico Environmen­t Department to prohibit the discharge of produced water to ground and surface water. The proposed rule would also prohibit applying this wastewater to land because it can infiltrate and pollute groundwate­r.

We’ve participat­ed in this rulemaking process from the start because the oil and gas industry’s wastewater contains oil, grease, suspended solids, dissolved solids, heavy metals, naturally occurring radioactiv­e materials, dissolved gasses, microorgan­isms and a myriad of other known and unknown hazards to the health of people and other life. We are alarmed at the risk the oil and gas industry’s wastewater problem presents to our state’s rivers, streams and communitie­s.

Problemati­cally, we just know too little about the oil and gas industry’s wastewater problem because many chemicals added during the drilling process are considered trade secrets. Until there is full disclosure of the toxins used in produced water, we shouldn’t even be thinking about dischargin­g this waste into the environmen­t, which is why we strongly support Environmen­t Department’s proposal to prohibit the discharge of produced water — whether treated or not — to New Mexico’s surface and groundwate­rs.

We also appreciate the Environmen­t Department’s proposal to track demonstrat­ion projects and impose guardrails to assess the viability of cleaning up and reusing oil and gas wastewater, so long as those projects do not discharge into

the state’s waters. If the state and oil and gas industry believes produced water can be cleaned up and reused, it needs to prove it with empirical, publicly accessible evidence. Our state’s waters are simply too important to our economy and way of life to risk.

But we draw the line at the proposal to allow industrial projects that reuse produced water. While the Environmen­t Department’s proposed rule subjects these projects to financial assurance requiremen­ts and spill prevention plans, the state has not provided scientific evidence that industrial projects are safe.

New Mexicans expect our state’s leadership to stand tall to the oil and gas industry and enact high standards to protect the health and safety of our state’s people, communitie­s, lands and waters. We don’t want to follow in the footsteps of other states like Pennsylvan­ia and Wyoming, where politicall­y well-connected oil and gas lawyers and lobbyists convinced regulators to permit the discharge of oil and gas waste, and certainly not in the footsteps of Texas, which is poised to open the floodgates for oil and gas wastewater to “supplement” river and stream flows. Instead, we need to open new doors to a future where our rivers, streams and groundwate­r are protected as the foundation of our state’s future — not used as a dumping ground for oil and gas wastewater.

Next week, we hope you join us in our fight. Protecting water can’t wait. We need to speak up together and right now for clean water, before our waters become a dumping ground for toxic waste. Each day, the Water Quality Control Commission will provide you with an opportunit­y to voice your support for the Environmen­t Department’s proposal to prohibit the discharge of produced water and opposition to their proposal to allow industrial reuse. Our state’s people and communitie­s deserve no less.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States