Sentinel & Enterprise

Jeffrey Clark to testify today? Get the popcorn, snacks ready

- By Gene Collier

Today is the day all the fiddling stops, by this estimation, the day the U. S. House Select Committee to Investigat­e the Jan. 6 Attack finally takes its first poke at a weight-bearing log in a seemingly interminab­le game of Jenga, Ultimate Politics edition.

Today is when Jeffrey Clark plans to actually show up and testify to Congress about the elaborate if politicall­y prepostero­us process that very nearly overturned an American election. Clark, a Philadelph­ia legal scholar, is part of Donald Trump’s Pennsylvan­ia connection, the other being U. S. Rep. Scott Perry of Harrisburg, who represents the mid-state 92nd District.

It was Perry, the noted Trump sycophant, who by most accounts connected Trump to Clark, whom the former president hoped to install as attorney general and a kind of end-of-plot closer who could leverage the Justice Department to halt the final certificat­ion of ballots.

Clark will be the first Trump official to comply with a subpoena, and unless he tirelessly invokes his Fifth Amendment right against self-incriminat­ion, plenty of Jenga logs might soon fall in the wake of his testimony.

On Sunday night, Rolling Stone published an investigat­ive piece detailing how two of the former president’s flunkies helped Congressio­nal Republican­s organize and plan the seditious events of Jan. 6, two operatives who made it plain they felt abused by Trump (really!) and eager to testify publicly as well.

Both of these auxiliary operatives told Rolling Stone they had multiple Jan. 6 planning conversati­ons with Republican­s Marjorie Taylor Greene, Paul Gosar, Lauren Boebert, Mo Brooks, Madison Cawthorn, Andy Biggs, Louie Gohmert and/or their top staffers.

“We would talk to Boebert’s team, Cawthorn’s team, Gosar’s team like back-to-back-toback” said one of the planners, and both said that Gosar of Arizona raised the possibilit­y of a blanket pardon on an unrelated investigat­ion as a way to solidify their assistance for Jan. 6.

Worse for the seditionis­ts, Clark and the Rolling Stone informants aren’t the only people ready to play ball with the House committee. Alyssa Farah, the longtime Trump loyalist and at one time his Director of Reflexive Insults (oh sorry, “strategic communicat­ions”), has spoken with the committee’s Republican members, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, according to CNN.

Then there’s John Eastman, the Trump lawyer who graciously stood next to Rudy Giuliani on the stage in Washington that day in January as a favor to those still deciding who was crazier, the felt fedora-wearing author of the memo, essentiall­y the equivalent of Ikea-assembly instructio­ns for scuttling an election, or Rudy.

Hint: It’s Rudy, but Eastman wasn’t done.

He soon went to the respected conservati­ve magazine The National Review and walked back every salient point of the Eastman memo, his own memo. Oh, he moon-walked it back, saying that having Vice President Mike Pence reject electoral votes was not “viable,” and pursuing such a strategy would have been “crazy.”

Still, my money’s on Clark as the potentiall­y biggest brick in the wall, as his machinatio­ns in and around the Justice Department in the weeks after the 2020 election seem the most transparen­t and the most damaging.

Clark’s superiors at DOJ, Jeffrey Rosen and Richard Donoghue, both told Trump that if he attempted to install Clark as attorney general to help him overturn the election, then there would be a mass resignatio­n in the department.

What Clark gets for being first in the store today is pole position for any potential feelings of prosecutor­ial leniency, I suppose, but his testimony could make it terribly uncomforta­ble for a lot of people who, so far, haven’t been slapped with anything tangible. There’s no evidence they so much as feel terribly uncomforta­ble.

In a call to the Justice Department, according to notes taken on that communicat­ion by Donoghue, Trump said, “Just say the election was corrupt,” and, “leave the rest to me and the Republican congressme­n.”

Trump still believes that you can make things true just by saying them. That’s a whole other level of crazy.

 ?? ?? Clark
Clark

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States