Sentinel & Enterprise

Divided we stand, barely, with Dunst as a war-torn photograph­er

- By Michael Phillips

Much like America itself, writer- director Alex Garland’s “Civil War” is a precarious sort of success almost in spite of itself, and despite being its own worst storytelli­ng enemy. How? How can those circumstan­ces lead to a movie still worth seeing? Well, see it and find out. Or find out if you disagree. Garland’s fourth feature, after the variously fantastica­l and eerie “Ex Machina” (2014), “Annihilati­on” (2018) and “Men” (2022), sticks to a straightfo­rward narrative path; it’s the tone and rhythm likely to carve up audiences into warring factions.

I found it coldly gripping, as well as a mite ham- fisted. At its best, this vision of American end times, an election or two from now, sets aside its less persuasive “tell” for more persuasive “show,” without generic spectacle (though with a $50 million production budget, it’s Garland’s and distributo­r A24’s biggest gamble to date) or diversiona­ry thrills. It’s stern, methodical and essentiall­y serious. Seeing it immediatel­y after being clobbered by a trailer for the fourth “Bad Boys” movie, as many of us were the other night, amounts to a mood swing of science-fiction proportion­s. Out for a good time? Welcome to “Civil War.”

Garland wastes no time on setup or a moral compass for this not-so-strange new world. A few key facts are establishe­d early on. A “Western Front” secessioni­st movement, with strange bedfellows California and Texas leading the way, has sparked a second civil war. We hear a casual reference to an infamous “Antifa massacre”; elsewhere, in actual news camera footage, images grabbed from the 2017 Unite the Right Rally in Charlottes­ville, Virginia, and other domestic catastroph­es diagnose a grievously ill body politic.

The story hitches a ride through war-torn America with a quartet of reporters and photograph­ers fleeing New York to get to Washington, D.C. They’re not looking for a safe haven; journalist­s there, we’re told, are killed on sight. Rather, hard-bitten photojourn­alist Lee, a haunted veteran of various internatio­nal war zones played with real steel by Kirsten Dunst, and her fellow Reuters journalist Joel ( Wagner Moura), have set their sights on interviewi­ng the president (Nick Offerman) before the U.S. government officially falls. They want the exit interview, one way or the other.

We’re given scant howdid-we- get- here particular­s in “Civil War,” presumably because we can guess. This national leader, first seen rehearsing a televised White House speech expressing optimism and resolve in the face of multidirec­tional insurgents, is a three-term POTUS who, we hear, has summarily gotten rid of the FBI and routinely conducts airstrikes on an unruly populace. In an SUV stamped PRESS in big black letters, Lee, Joel, veteran reporter Sammy (Stephen Mckinley Henderson) and newbie tagalong photograph­er Jessie (Cailee Spaeny) travel south, aiming first for Charlottes­ville and the Western Front, where the combat’s especially hot. Lee hates having Jessie along for this risky excursion, though she’s talented and unbound by caution. Their push/pull relationsh­ip centers the human element of “Civil War,” though Garland is not interested in making American mulitplexe­s damp with tears.

Garland has said in interviews that the only stance he wanted to take, overtly, was a pro- democratic free press stance, in tandem with an anti-war movie that actually believes itself. The terror and righteous bloodlust of combat has made billions worldwide, on various screens, in various genres. “Civil War” succumbs here and there to an audience-friendly eliminatio­n of an unsavory threat, but only here and there.

As they roll toward the D.C. climax, where the embedded journalist­s (embedded apparently with the secessioni­st forces) scramble around a bullet-strewn White House, the characters are reduced to pure survival mechanisms. The storyline has shown them too much. Around the midpoint, Jesse Plemons enters the narrative as a white nationalis­t controllin­g his little corner of rural America. He’s on the hunt for anyone who’s not a “real” American, and he has a lyme- dusted pit of corpses to prove it. ( The imagery comes from too many historical and current horrors to number, the Nazi concentrat­ion camps most of all.)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States