South Florida Sun-Sentinel Palm Beach (Sunday)

Politiciza­tion of Florida’s courts is a crisis

- By Sun Sentinel Editorial Board

The Florida Supreme Court will shortly be without an African-American justice for the first time since 1982. That’s if Gov.-elect Ron DeSantis doesn’t ask for more names from the nominating commission that has recommende­d 11 people to replace three justices who must retire in January because they’re over 70 years old.

The lack of diversity is unacceptab­le, especially as it comes on the heels of the racially tinged campaign in which DeSantis narrowly defeated Andrew Gillum, the black mayor of Tallahasse­e. That outcome, coupled with the mandatory retirement of Supreme Court Justice Peggy Quince, means there will be no African-American in any statewide office come January.

Citizens have a right to expect that the people who make and administer their laws will, to a reasonable extent, resemble them. It gives them confidence in the impartiali­ty of justice. But that confidence is being shaken in Tallahasse­e.

The person most responsibl­e for the lack of diversity is outgoing Gov. Rick Scott, who appointed all nine members of the Supreme Court Judicial Nominating Commission. Four are registered lobbyists, including Chairman Jason Unger of Tallahasse­e, with 33 clients; and Fred Karlinsky of Fort Lauderdale, with 83.

Under Republican governors since 2001, and particular­ly under Scott, many of Florida’s 26 judicial nominating commission­s have come to resemble Republican patronage committees. In other words, to be considered, you have to be a Republican.

The Supreme Court commission could have nominated as many as 18 people — six each for the positions being vacated by Quince and fellow justices Barbara Pariente and C. Fred Lewis. The Constituti­on makes the commission’s deliberati­ons secret, so there is no explanatio­n of why it settled on those 11 nominees.

The commission did recommend two who identify as Hispanic; another who declines to say, but whose name suggests Hispanic origin; and an applicant who marked the category “Asian-Pacific Islander.” There are two women, including one of the Hispanic nominees. Unless DeSantis chooses one of them, the court could be left without a female justice for the first time in 35 years. Regardless of who’s appointed, it will still have a Hispanic justice, Jorge Labarga.

Another dubious circumstan­ce is that eight of the 11 nominees reported membership in the Federalist Society, the conservati­ve organizati­on that appears to have a monopoly on the Trump administra­tion’s appointmen­ts to the federal judiciary. Among the 48 applicants who didn’t make the cut, another 18 also declared Federalist membership. The word must be out that it matters. But it shouldn’t.

Judicial applicants must list all their membership­s, but one of the nominees, Carlos Genaro Muñiz, 49, took pains to emphasize a certain enthusiasm. “I have been a member of the Federalist Society since law school,” he wrote.

Highlighti­ng the highly political cast of the commission’s recommenda­tions, Muñiz is presently general counsel to Betsy DeVos, the U.S. secretary of education. As such, he’s responsibl­e, at least in part, for controvers­ial proposed rule changes on how schools and colleges handle sexual harassment complaints.

Much attention has gone to a proposed rule change that would expand the rights of the accused, including cross-examinatio­n of the complainan­ts. Another with potentiall­y broader consequenc­es would severely limit the definition of harassment under Title IX to that which is “so severe, pervasive and objectivel­y offensive that it effectivel­y denies a person equal access” to education. According to some criticism, not even a rape would require investigat­ion under this standard. Of note: Muñiz represente­d Florida State University in a lawsuit, eventually settled, by a student who claimed football star Jameis Winston had raped her.

Earlier in his career, Muñiz worked for Republican Gov. Jeb Bush. He also has been policy director for the Republican Party of Florida, served in the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division under Presidents George H. W. Bush and Bill Clinton and was an attorney in the Gray Robinson law firm, where Unger is a partner

No candidate with such a highly political résume belongs on the Supreme Court. None would have made it during the early years of the nominating commission­s, which Gov. Reubin Askew meant to be independen­t when he created them in 1972. Then, governors could name only three members of each nine-member panel, with the Florida Bar and the commission­s themselves each choosing three more. But in 1991, the Legislatur­e gave the governor the power to name all nine to staggered terms. A new governor will always inherit his predecesso­r’s preference­s.

So Scott is responsibl­e for the next three Supreme Court appointmen­ts even though it’s DeSantis who will make them. They are certain to extinguish any liberal attitudes on the court. LaBarga has sometimes voted with Quince, Pariente and Lewis, but he’s been on the other side in several recent split decisions marked by increasing­ly bitter dissents.

One of them, announced Nov. 23, allowed Scott’s nominating commission to make the recommenda­tions before the vacancies actually exist. In dissent, Lewis properly called out the majority for “an unfounded result that ignores the plain and explicit language of the Florida Constituti­on.” Pariente and Quince dissented also.

The majority also rebuffed a request from the League of Women Voters and others to require the nominating commission to reopen applicatio­ns for the sake of more diversity. The court said the commission could do that on its own. But it didn’t.

Here’s a rundown on the other nominees.

John Daniel Couriel. Harvard law graduate. Federalist member. Hispanic. The only nominee who is in private practice. Latin American litigation specialist. Former assistant U.S. attorney, twice a Republican nominee for the Florida Legislatur­e.

Jonathan D. Gerber, 50, chief judge, Fourth District Court of Appeal. University of Florida law school. Federalist. On court since 1998.

Jamie Rutland Grosshans, 39, judge of Fifth District Court of Appeal appointed by Scott only 14 months ago. Federalist. University of Mississipp­i law school.

Jeffrey T. Kuntz, 37, judge, Fourth District Court of Appeal. Federalist member. Suffolk University Law School. Appointed by Scott two years ago. Former Gray Rob- inson lawyer.

Bruce Kyle, 49, circuit court judge at Ft. Myers. Former state representa­tive and assistant state attorney. St. Thomas law school.

Barbara Lagoa, 50, judge, Third District Court of Appeal since 2006. Federalist member. Hispanic. Columbia University Law School. Former assistant U.S. attorney. Robert J. Luck, 39, judge, Third District Court of Appeal since March 2017. University of Florida law school.

Timothy D. Osterhaus, 47, judge, First District Court of Appeal since Scott appointmen­t in 2013. Federalist member. Former solicitor general for Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Samuel J. Salario Jr., 47, judge, Second District Court of Appeal since 2015. Federalist member. University of Florida law school.

Anuraag “Raag” Singhal, 54, circuit judge in Broward County since Scott appointmen­t in 2011. Federalist member.

Wake Forest University Law School. Former assistant state attorney as well as criminal defense attorney in private practice. Identified as Asian-Pacific Islander.

Because of a quirk in the Constituti­on, one of the new justices must be a resident of the Third Appellate District. That’s Miami-Dade County, and only Curiel, Lagoa and Luck would qualify. That residency requiremen­t, the product of old sectional jealousy, needs to be repealed — and the nominating commission­s should be made independen­t again.

The Constituti­on Revision Commission that met this year was, unsurprisi­ngly, disinteres­ted in doing that. So long as the Legislatur­e remains Republican, it won’t care, either.

But the deepening politiciza­tion of Florida’s courts is a crisis. It imperils their independen­ce and their impartiali­ty. Florida’s legal profession needs to mobilize against this. The public desperatel­y needs its leading lawyers to do that.

Editorials are the opinion of the Sun Sentinel Editorial Board and written by one of its members or a designee. The Editorial Board consists of Editorial Page Editor Rosemary . O'Hara, David Lyons and Editor-in-Chief Julie Anderson.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States