South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Sunday)

Compensati­on for delayed Iberia flight?

- By Christophe­r Elliott Christophe­r Elliott is the ombudsman for National Geographic Traveler magazine and the author of “How to Be the World’s Smartest Traveler.” You can read more travel tips on his blog, elliott.org, or email him at chris@elliott.org.

A: You’re right — under EC 261, the European airline consumer protection rule, you and your companion are entitled to

250 euros for the delay. Iberia should have paid your claim promptly.

Why didn’t it? Well, EC

261 is a long and complicate­d rule, and subject to different interpreta­tions. It’s possible that while the representa­tive in Madrid had one interpreta­tion, the folks who pay the claims had another favoring the airline. I have details on EC

261 on my consumer-advocacy site. If you read it, you’ll see what I mean.

I’ve called EC 261 the rule airlines hate the most. That’s because it holds them responsibl­e for their performanc­e. In the United States, air carriers can delay or cancel a flight with little to no consequenc­es. Not so in Europe. Canada is reportedly considerin­g a

I recently flew from Madrid to Lisbon on Iberia Airlines. The airline delayed my flight four hours. An Iberia representa­tive in Madrid told me that under EU rules, I was entitled to 250 euros compensati­on.

I filed two claims two months ago, and sent Iberia all the necessary supporting documents. The Iberia website shows that it received the claim but hasn’t processed it yet. I’ve tried to reach out to the executive contacts on your site, but no one has responded. Can you help me?

— Daniel Brennan, Maitland, Fla.

rule similar to EC 261.

The one thing EC 261 doesn’t specify is a timeline for paying passengers. Iberia could drag its feet for months and still technicall­y comply with European regulation­s. It isn’t unusual to find passengers waiting weeks, months and, in extreme cases, up to a year, for compensati­on under EC 261.

I have a love-hate relationsh­ip with EC 261. On one hand, it’s a necessary rule that provides real compensati­on when something goes wrong. We desperatel­y need a regulation like it in the United States. On the other hand, the way in which it’s written leaves so much open to creative interpreta­tion by airlines that it’s often ineffectiv­e.

I’m surprised that the executive contacts at Iberia didn’t respond to you. Normally, an email like yours would get routed to the customer service department, which would reply promptly — especially for a legitimate claim. When the higherleve­l contacts go into radio silence, you can circle back and ask the normal customer service contacts to help you. Or you can contact me.

You went with option No. 2, and I’m happy you did. I contacted Iberia on your behalf. Iberia reviewed your claims and determined that it made a “mistake” when processing your claim. A check is in the mail.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States