South Florida Sun-Sentinel (Sunday)

What does end of Yeezy mean for Sneakerver­se?

- By Vanessa Friedman

The Yeezys are disappeari­ng. Off the shelves — and sites — of Adidas. Gone from Foot Locker. No longer displayed at Christie’s New York headquarte­rs, where in early October the Nike Air Yeezy

1 prototypes that in 2021 were auctioned for $1.8 million had sat in state awaiting another sale. (It was canceled.) As Kanye West’s corporate partnershi­ps have evaporated in the wake of antisemiti­c and anti-Black statements, his products, and especially his shoes, have likewise seemed to vanish from sight.

Yet on resale sites StockX, Stadium Goods and GOAT, where sneakers are traded like commoditie­s and collectibl­es, hundreds of pairs can still be found. And in the chat rooms on Discord and Reddit where sneakerhea­ds gather, a debate is raging about what the fall of Ye, as West is known, means for the future of what was called “an alternativ­e asset class,” or an investment that isn’t in stocks or bonds, by Cowen Equity Research in 2019.

There are those like Christophe­r George, founder of the “cook group” House of Carts (a cook group is a group that shares and monitor informatio­n on drops and resale), who, on the day the Adidas announceme­nt was released, advised his 1,500 members, “If you are holding loads of Yeezys I would

100 percent be looking for an exit plan.”

And then there are those like Andre Ljustina, founder of sneaker and streetwear site Project Blitz, who believes that the end of the Adidas Yeezy partnershi­p will simply make the shoes more collectibl­e — that “when the smoke clears, their value will go up.”

The result of these mixed messages, said

Mbiyimoh Ghogomu, chief executive of Tradeblock, a sneaker trading platform with more than 200,000 users, is “rampant speculatio­n.”

At issue is not just the social currency attached to sneakers but a market that Cowen predicted could reach $30 billion globally by 2030, that has had museum exhibition­s and documentar­ies devoted to its evolution, and that has been powered, said Jordan Geller, founder of the ShoeZeum and recipient of the 2012 Guinness World Records title for largest collection of sneakers, by the twin engines of “Nike’s Air Jordans and Adidas’ Yeezys.”

If one of those engines sputters, what happens next? It’s an “unpreceden­ted” situation, Geller said.

Moving the sneaker market

To understand why the fall of Yeezy could move the whole sneaker market, you first have to understand how sneakers accrue their value. As with any collectibl­e market, like art or jewelry, how much an item is worth is based in large part on scarcity. But when it comes to sneakers, nostalgia and the cultural capital attached to its creator also play a role.

While kicks have long had their own subcultura­l semiology (reaching all the way back to the Converse All Star in

1917), it was the emergence of Michael Jordan and his Air Jordans in the

mid-1980s, along with the rise of hip-hop, that shot them into the heart of the popular conversati­on and identity. Fans dreamed of being in his shoes — and then they actually could be. They remembered when they saw Jordan playing in the shoes.

While other brands and collaborat­ions had their moments, it wasn’t until Ye joined forces with Adidas in 2013 after a fallout with Nike that a real competitor

began to emerge. Until then, George said, “nothing even came close.”

“Before that, Adidas was irrelevant,” Geller agreed. “It wasn’t very popular with collectors. But when they signed Kanye, they instantly got street cred and became important.”

Rather than situating his cool in sports, Ye grounded it in his music, opening up a whole path of consumer connection. “He sang ‘Yeezy jumped over jumpman,’ ” George said, “and he did.” Ye previewed his shoes onstage, stoking anticipati­on, making them news, attaching them to an experience.

“It changed everything,” Ljustina said. “Adidas started to take energy from Nike.”

In 2018, a paper from Moritz Lutz and Peter Bug of Reutlingen University in Germany found that Nike, Air Jordan and Adidas accounted for 98% of the total sneaker resale market revenue globally. And when it comes to the Adidas share, Ljustina of Project Blitz said, most of that is Yeezys.

But according to Gerome Sapp, chief executive of Rares, the fractional investment corporatio­n that bought the Yeezy prototype in 2021 for $1.8 million — and that had intended to allow its investors to cash out through the now-canceled sale at Christie’s — when it comes to the Yeezys made with Adidas, there is a “fundamenta­l difference between the Jordan brand and the Yeezy brand, which is the Yeezy brand is not about scarcity.”

For the most part, people buy Yeezys to wear, he said. They buy Jordans to store and collect.

Ljustina also said that a majority of Yeezys sold for much less than Jordans — for prices closer to their original retail price — in part because there are so many more of them in circulatio­n. (He also said that what resellers lose in profit on each shoe they offset in volume.)

That’s important because it explains why Ye’s recent remarks may have a negative effect on the resale market. If you buy a shoe

to wear, and that shoe becomes associated with a toxic viewpoint, it could connect you with those ideas by associatio­n, in the way wearing a MAGA hat may imply a political view.

The future price of Yeezys

When some sneakerhea­ds reach for a comparable situation to predict what will happen to Adidas Yeezy prices, they talk about when Ye left Nike, or when Virgil Abloh and Kobe Bryant died, and the fact that their shoes became immediatel­y collectibl­e.

But “that was a totally different era,” Sapp of Rares said of the Ye/Nike analogy. “Then Ye was at the top of his game, artistical­ly, culturally and as a celebrity. There was no catastroph­ic hate speech that broke that relationsh­ip.”

Rosalind Chow, an associate professor of organizati­onal behavior at Carnegie Mellon University, said the controvers­y could actually make Adidas Yeezys more attractive to certain collectors — as the shoe that symbolized the downfall of

Ye — though it was unclear “just how many collectors.”

On StockX, the online marketplac­e that tracks the value of Yeezys and other sneakers and apparel, Foam Runners and Boost 700 V2s have oscillated between steep declines in price and rebounds, if not quite to their original level, then close to it. (StockX did not respond to emails requesting comment.)

In the short term, no one doubts that this will work to Nike’s favor. It also opens up the field for a new brand to step into the vacuum. Speculatio­n has now begun on what name that might be. Ljustina is waiting to see what happens with Jerry Lorenzo’s Fear of God collaborat­ion with Adidas. (Lorenzo was once part of Ye’s creative circle.)

George said he believed New Balance was “poised to take over Adidas’ spot.” Brahm Wachter, head of the Sotheby’s streetwear and modern collectibl­es department, which originally sold those $1.8 million Yeezys, agreed.

“That’s the horse I’d be watching,” he said.

 ?? NIKE ?? As Ye’s corporate partnershi­ps have evaporated, his products — and especially his shoes such as the Nike Air Yeezy 2, above — have likewise seemed to have vanished from sight. Hundreds of pairs are still available on resale sites.
NIKE As Ye’s corporate partnershi­ps have evaporated, his products — and especially his shoes such as the Nike Air Yeezy 2, above — have likewise seemed to have vanished from sight. Hundreds of pairs are still available on resale sites.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States