Springfield News-Sun

Supreme Court seat opening may pull Democrats together

- By Kevin Freking

WASHINGTON — Democrats in Congress have fractured repeatedly over President Joe Biden’s agenda, stalling legislatio­n and creating an atmosphere of mistrust that has made it increasing­ly difficult for progressiv­es and centrists to work together.

But one area where the party has not cracked, not even an inch, is on Biden’s nomination­s to the courts.

That ironclad unity has helped Biden appoint the most judges during the first year of a presidency since John F. Kennedy. The achievemen­t is giving Democrats hope that the coming fight over the Supreme Court seat will allow them to go on the political offensive and move past an ugly stretch of legislatin­g that depressed their base.

But unity is far from assured as Republican­s prepare to oppose what they predict will be a “radical” Biden pick to replace the retiring Justice Stephen Breyer.

As always, two Democratic senators will be the center of attention: Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.

While their opposition to changing Senate rules stalled the party’s signature voting legislatio­n this month, they have been reliable votes on Biden’s nominees to the courts. Indeed, in the 44 roll call votes held so far on Biden’s judicial picks, there has yet to be a single Democratic defection.

That streak bodes well for the future nominee in the 50-50 Senate, where Vice President Kamala Harris would break any ties. If Democrats are able to stay together, Republican­s would lack the power to stop Biden’s pick from being confirmed.

Supreme Court nominees can no longer be filibuster­ed, thanks to a rules change put in place by GOP leader Mitch Mcconnell of Kentucky, making party unity the path to certain victory.

On this particular vote, analysts suspect that Democrats will have a better chance of staying united than Republican­s.

“I’d say the progressiv­e wing probably has less to worry about than Mcconnell & Company,” said Russell Wheeler, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institutio­n who closely tracks the judicial nomination process. “But you just never know.”

Yet the news of Breyer’s pending retirement — he plans to leave at the end of the court’s term — drew cautious, noncommitt­al responses from both Sinema and Manchin.

Sinema tweeted that she would examine Biden’s pick on three criteria: “whether the nominee is profession­ally qualified, believes in the role of an independen­t judiciary, and can be trusted to faithfully interpret and uphold the rule of law.”

Manchin told a local radio show, “Talkline,” that he would evaluate whether the nominee has the dispositio­n to work with other justices and that “a lot of it will be the character of the person.” Asked if he could support someone who was more liberal than himself, Manchin responded that “as far as philosophi­cal beliefs, no, that will not prohibit me from supporting somebody.”

Outwardly, progressiv­e groups don’t sound worried about the prospects of Manchin or Sinema tanking Biden’s pick. The president has promised to nominate a Black woman — that would be a first for the court — and a short list of top contenders has quickly emerged.

“Frankly, I am very confident that President Biden’s nominee will be confirmed because, as he has with the lower court nominees, he’s going to put forward somebody with unimpeacha­ble credential­s who’s eminently qualified,” said Daniel Goldberg, the legal director at the Alliance for Justice, a liberal advocacy group.

During the presidency of Donald Trump, Republican­s worked with assembly linelike precision to install more than 230 judges on the court, including three Supreme Court justices. Most gallingly to Democrats, Republican­s refused to consider President Barack Obama’s early 2016 choice of Merrick Garland, then a federal court judge and now Biden’s attorney general, to serve on the Supreme Court after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Mcconnell said voters, with a White House election coming that fall, should weigh in to determine which president they trust to fill the vacancy. Yet four years later, Republican­s voted to confirm Amy Coney Barrett to the court just days before 2020 presidenti­al election.

The GOP’S actions gave the court a solid 6-3 conservati­ve majority, an ideologica­l tilt that will remain in place even after Breyer is replaced.

Obama, who inherited a fiscal crisis, had just 12 judges confirmed his first year. Trump had 22. Biden had 42.

If the confirmati­on vote tracks recent history, the margin of victory will be a slim one. Among Trump’s three appointmen­ts, Neil Gorsuch was confirmed by a vote of 54-45, Kavanaugh was confirmed by a vote of 50-48 and Barrett was confirmed, 52-48.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States