Springfield News-Sun

Report: Justice Dept. believes Trump has more documents

- Michael S. Schmidt, Maggie Haberman and Katie Benner

A top Justice Department official told former President Donald Trump’s lawyers in recent weeks that the department believed he had not returned all the documents he took when he left the White House, according to two people briefed on the matter.

The outreach from the official, Jay Bratt, who leads the department’s counterint­elligence operations, is the most concrete indication yet that investigat­ors remain skeptical that Trump has been fully cooperativ­e in their efforts to recover documents that the former president was supposed to have turned over to the National Archives at the end of his term.

It is not clear what steps the Justice Department might take to retrieve any material it thinks Trump still holds.

And it is not known whether the Justice Department has gathered new evidence that Trump has held onto government material even after the court-authorized search in August of Mar-a-lago, his private club and residence in Florida, and 18 months of previous efforts by the federal government to persuade the former president to return what he had taken on leaving office.

The Justice Department declined to comment.

The outreach from the department prompted a rift among Trump’s lawyers about how to respond, with one camp counseling a cooperativ­e approach that would include bringing in an outside firm to conduct a further search for documents and another advising Trump to maintain a more combative posture.

The more combative camp, the people briefed on the matter said, won out.

The government has found more than 300 classified documents in material that had been kept at Mar-a-lago, including some marked as containing the most sensitive informatio­n that would cross the president’s desk.

But the Justice Department has previously signaled doubts that Trump had turned over everything in his possession. Shortly after the search in August, it was revealed that federal investigat­ors had found dozens of empty folders at Mara-lago marked as containing classified informatio­n. The disclosure raised further questions about whether the Justice Department had indeed recovered all the classified materials that may have been taken out of the White House.

The empty folders were found during the search of Mar-a-lago along with 40 other empty folders that said they contained sensitive documents that should be returned “to staff secretary/military aide,” according to a court filing. Agents found the empty folders along with seven documents marked as “top secret” in Trump’s office. Investigat­ors also found 11 more marked as “top secret” in a storage room.

The department has also signaled in court filings that it has continued to try to determine whether more government materials remain unaccounte­d for. In a September court filing, the Justice Department complained that a judge’s decision to bar authoritie­s from having access to the documents they seized in the search — later partially reversed by a federal appeals court — would limit their ability to determine whether documents were missing.

The injunction, the department said in the filing, “appears to bar the FBI and DO J from further reviewing the records to discern any patterns in the types of records that were retained, which could lead to identifica­tion of other records still missing.”

Justice Department officials and representa­tives of Trump have held a number of discussion­s in recent weeks. After the call from Bratt, who has led the Justice Department’s investigat­ion into Trump’s handling of the documents, Trump initially agreed to go along with the advice of one of his lawyers, Christophe­r M. Kise, who suggested hiring a forensic firm to search for additional documents, according to the people briefed on the matter.

But other lawyers in Trump’s circle — who have argued for taking a more adversaria­l posture in dealing with the Justice Department — disagreed with Kise’s approach. They talked Trump out of the idea and have encouraged him to maintain an aggressive stance toward authoritie­s, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States