Springfield News-Sun

Midterms free of feared chaos at polling places

- By Nicholas Riccardi

Before Election Day, anxiety mounted over potential chaos at the polls.

Election officials warned about poll watchers who had been steeped in conspiracy theories falsely claiming that then-president Donald Trump did not actually lose the 2020 election. Democrats and voting rights groups worried about the effects of new election laws, in some Republican-controlled states, that President Joe Biden decried as “Jim Crow 2.0.” Law enforcemen­t agencies were monitoring possible threats at the polls.

Yet Election Day, and the weeks of early voting before it, went fairly smoothly. There were some reports of unruly poll watchers disrupting voting, but they were scattered.

Groups of armed vigilantes began watching over a handful of ballot drop boxes in Arizona until a judge ordered them to stay far away to ensure they would not intimidate voters. And while it might take months to figure out their full impact, Gopbacked voting laws enacted after the 2020 election did not appear to cause major disruption­s the way they did during the March primary in Texas.

“The entire ecosystem in a lot of ways has become more resilient in the aftermath of 2020,” said Amber Mcreynolds, a former Denver elections director who advises a number of voting rights organizati­ons. “There’s been a lot of effort on ensuring things went well.”

Even though some voting experts’ worst fears didn’t materializ­e, some voters still experience­d the types of routine foul-ups that happen on a small scale in every election. Many of those fell disproport­ionately on Black and Hispanic voters.

“Things went better than expected,” said Amir Badat of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. “But we have to say that with a caveat: Our expectatio­ns are low.”

Badat said his organizati­on recorded long lines at various polling places from South Carolina to Texas.

There were problems in Harris County, Texas, which includes Houston. Shortages of paper ballots and at least one polling location opening late led to long lines and triggered an investigat­ion of the predominan­tly Democratic county by the state’s Republican authoritie­s.

The investigat­ion is partly a reflection of how certain voting snafus on Election Day are increasing­ly falling on Republican voters, who have been discourage­d from using mailed ballots or using early in-person voting by Trump and his allies. But it’s a very different problem from what Texas had during its March primary.

Then, a controvers­ial new voting law that increased the requiremen­ts on mail ballots led to about 13% of all such ballots being rejected, much higher compared with other elections. It was an ominous sign for a wave of new laws, but there have been no problems of that scale reported for the general election.

Texas changed the design of its mail ballots, which solved many of the problems voters had putting identifyin­g informatio­n in the proper place. Other states that added regulation­s on voting didn’t appear to have widespread problems, though voting rights groups and analysts say it will take weeks of combing through data to find out the laws’ impacts.

The Brennan Center for Justice at the NYU School of Law is compiling data to determine whether new voting laws in states such as Georgia contribute­d to a drop in turnout among Black and Hispanic voters. Preliminar­y figures show turnout was lower this year than in the last midterm election in Florida, Georgia, Iowa and Texas — four states that passed significan­t voting restrictio­ns since the 2020 election — although there could be a number of reasons why.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States