Springfield News-Sun

House Joint Resolution 6 most brazen power grab in decades

- Thomas Suddes Thomas Suddes is a former legislativ­e reporter with The Plain Dealer in Cleveland and writes from Ohio University. You can reach him at tsuddes@gmail.com.

Ohio House Republican­s have stalled, if only for now, a plan (House Joint Resolution 6) to make it harder for Ohioans to amend the state constituti­on.

The plan to hobble voters, backed by GOP Secretary of State Frank Larose, could still reach May 2’s ballot if the new General Assembly, which will meet Jan. 3, approves it fast enough.

Were voters to OK the plan — with a “yes” vote of at least 50% plus one (the current requiremen­t for constituti­onal amendments) — then future amendments would require a “yes” vote of at least 60%. The sponsor of HJR 6 is Republican Rep. Brian Stewart, of Pickaway County’s Ashville.

Plainly put, HJR 6 could make it exceedingl­y difficult for pro-abortionch­oice advocates, or gerrymande­ring foes, to win statewide ballot issues addressing either issue.

As it is, Republican­s run the Ohio General Assembly. Republican­s run the Ohio Supreme Court. Republican­s run Ohio’s executive branch, from the governorsh­ip on down. The next agenda item, evidently, is to gag Ohio’s voters.

The proposed 60% requiremen­t is arguably the most brazen attempted Statehouse power grab since an earlier Gop-run legislatur­e, and Republican then-gov. James A. Rhodes (on another May 2 — in 1967) proposed an Ohio Bond Commission.

The Bond Commission — had voters not vetoed it with a 67% “no” vote — could have run up Ohio’s general obligation bond debt without voters’ OK, something forbidden then, still forbidden now — one reason Ohio’s credit rating is as strong as it is.

Furthermor­e: When the 2023-24 Ohio General Assembly begins its session next month, legislator­s’ main goal should be to write a balanced state budget for the two years that’ll begin July 1.

In that connection, there is an added factor that will help stoke Ohio’s 2023-24 budget debate: Continued funding for the Fair School Funding plan, which legislator­s began to fund in the current budget.

The expectatio­n (or at least the implicatio­n) has been that the state Senate and Ohio House will continue the Fair School Funding plan’s outlays in the 2023-24 budget. But there’s a complicati­ng factor. A fair number of the General Assembly’s Republican­s favor so-called school choice “backpack” plans — in effect, no matter a family’s income or school district, a universal school voucher program to help families pay for private K-12 school tuition.

That idea enjoys a spectrum of support among conservati­ves. Just as predictabl­y the Ohio Education Associatio­n is opposed because of the threat voucher plans present to traditiona­l public school funding. There’s no telling if the idea will come to a Statehouse vote in 2023 or 2024, but people on either side of the issue should remember this:

Since Ohio began schoolvouc­her programs 27 years ago, in 1995 (for pupils in Cleveland’s schools), the legislatur­e has constantly expanded school-choice in Ohio, sometimes slowly, yes — but steadily.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States