Springfield News-Sun

Sanders’ tone-deaf rebuttal shows how out of step Republican­s are

- Paul Krugman Paul Krugman is an economist and a columnist for The New York Times.

Political speeches, very much including State of the Union addresses, rarely make much difference. They can, however, be useful guides to the political landscape.

President Joe Biden was evidently feeling feisty Tuesday. In particular, he kept baiting Republican­s with the suggestion that a number of them are threatenin­g Medicare and Social Security — which they are.

Delivering the Republican response, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders claimed that the United States is divided between two parties, one of which is mainly focused on bread-andbutter issues that matter to regular people, while the other is obsessed with waging culture war. This is also true. But she got her parties mixed up — Republican­s, not Democrats, are the culture warriors who’ve lost touch with ordinary Americans’ concerns.

First, about Medicare and Social Security. When Biden said that “some Republican­s want Medicare and Social Security to sunset,” he was greeted with shouts of “Liar!” But last year Florida Sen. Rick Scott, chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, released a “plan to rescue America” that explicitly included as one of its reforms “All federal legislatio­n sunsets in five years.”

Yes, a program that sunsets can be renewed. But what Biden said was true — and how sure are you that the modern GOP would, in fact, vote to maintain Social Security and Medicare as they currently exist?

There’s also the matter of arithmetic. Republican­s have pledged to eliminate the budget deficit within 10 years, and unless we raise taxes — which they vehemently oppose — that’s essentiall­y impossible without cuts in Medicare and Social Security.

And let’s not forget that these are programs for seniors — programs that are central to Americans’ long-term financial planning, the bedrock on which most people’s hopes for a decent, dignified retirement rest. Putting them on the chopping block every five years, even potentiall­y, would create immense anxiety.

Hence the hysterical GOP response to Biden’s claims. But those claims were entirely true.

But let’s talk about the Sanders response to Biden, which was even more revealing.

Sanders’ speech was a diatribe against wokeness. This is standard GOP fare these days and exactly what you’d expect in, say, an address at the Conservati­ve Political Action Conference. But this wasn’t a CPAC speech; it was meant to address the nation as a whole and rebut the president of the United States.

So as Greg Sargent of The Washington Post points out, it was remarkable that Sanders spoke largely in right-wing insider jargon. She boasted of eliminatin­g CRT in her state, without even explaining the abbreviati­on; how many Americans know that it stands for “critical race theory,” let alone why that’s supposed to be such a bad thing?

For that matter, focus groups suggest most people don’t know what “wokeness” means or why they should fear it.

But wait, it gets worse. Sanders seemed to say (although her syntax was a bit garbled) that woke policy was responsibl­e for “high gas prices” and “empty grocery shelves.”

So first of all, how does that work? How did critical race theory cause a global spike in crude oil prices, which raised prices at the pump all around the world? How did it snarl supply chains and cause a worldwide shortage of shipping containers?

Second, a politician who was actually in touch with real people’s concerns would know that the examples she used to illustrate Biden’s policy failures are well past their sell-by date. Gas prices did indeed surge for a while, hitting around $5 a gallon in the summer. But they’ve fallen drasticall­y since then.

And the complaint about empty shelves is even more out of date. Supply chains were messed up a year ago, but the pressure has greatly eased, and while there are always a few scarce items, complaints about empty shelves are stale.

Indeed, Sanders showed us Republican­s can’t step outside their universe even when they should have strong political incentives to sound like normal people and pretend to care about regular Americans’ concerns.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States