Springfield News-Sun

New rule would clarify 'Made in USA' labeling

- By Jonel Aleccia

Shoppers could soon find it easier to tell if those grocery store steaks or pork chops were really “Made in the USA.”

Federal agricultur­e officials on Monday released new require ments t hat would allow labels on meat, poultry or eggs to use that phrase — or “Product of USA” — only if they come from animals “born, raised, slaughtere­d and processed in the United States.”

That’s a sharp change from current policy, which allows voluntary use of such labels on products from animals that have been imported from a foreign country and slaughtere­d in the U.S., but also on meat that’s been imported and repackaged or further processed.

Imports of beef from countries including Australia, Canada and Brazil, for instance, account for about 12% of the total con- sumed in the U.S. Overall, imports of red meat and poultry account for less than 6%, while imports of eggs account for less than half of 1%.

U.S. Department of Agricultur­e Secretary Tom Vilsack said the proposed rule would better align the labels with consumers’ views. A survey commission­ed by the USDA found that nearly twothirds of shoppers believed that a “Product of USA” label meant that most or all meat production steps occurred in the U.S.

“There’s obviously a disconnect between what the consumers’ understand­ings and expectatio­ns are and what the label currently is,” Vilsack said in an interview.

About 12% of all meat, poultry and egg products sold in the country carry the U.s.-origin labels, USDA officials said.

The label change was first proposed by President Joe Biden in 2021 and was included last year in a series of steps to bolster the U.S. meat and poultry supply chain.

The USDA survey, con- ducted last summer, included a nationally representa­tive sample of more than 4,800 American adults who do the grocery shopping for their families and who bought beef or pork in the previous six months. More than 40% of the shoppers said they look for the USA label when buying meat.

The rule was praised by consumer advocates and representa­tives for U.S. ranchers and farmers, including the U.S. Cattle- men’s Associatio­n, which petitioned the USDA for the label change in 2019.

“The proposed rule finally closes this loophole by accu- rately defining what these voluntary origin claims mean,” said Justin Tupper, the group’s president. “If it says ‘Made in the USA,’ then it should be from cattle that have only known USA soil. Consumers have the right to know where their food comes from, full stop.”

Thomas Gremillion, director of food policy for the Consumer Federation of America, said the change is a “small but important step” that should have been made long ago.

Under the current rule, Gremillion noted, a cow can be raised in Mexico under that country’s regulation­s for feed and medication­s, then shipped across the border and slaughtere­d that same day to make ground beef and steaks that qualify as “Product of USA.”

Carrie Balkcom, executive director of the trade group American Grassfed Associatio­n, said the existing rule also penalizes small domestic producers.

“It’s expensive to raise grass-raised animals from scratch,” Balkcom said.

“And these large producers were importing these animals raised elsewhere and just repackagin­g them and then kind of coasting on the ‘Made in the USA’ label.”

 ?? KEITH SRAKOCIC / ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Federal agricultur­e officials on Monday proposed more restrictiv­e requiremen­ts for labeling meat and eggs as “Made in the USA.”
KEITH SRAKOCIC / ASSOCIATED PRESS Federal agricultur­e officials on Monday proposed more restrictiv­e requiremen­ts for labeling meat and eggs as “Made in the USA.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States