Stamford Advocate (Sunday)

Something’s in the air, and it’s not good

-

Be honest ... How fast would you drive if there were no danger of a ticket? Would you adhere to building compliance­s if there were no penalties? Would you think twice about eating in restaurant­s if they were never inspected?

Would you text while driving if there were no cops on local roads?

A lot of people live recklessly despite the potential of penalties. The same goes for businesses. Restaurant­s may shrug off a fine resulting from a failed inspection, but express outrage when we publish their shortcomin­gs to potential customers.

So, it makes us uncomforta­ble to discover the state agency in charge of protecting the air we breathe has apparently been easing up on factories, gas stations and marinas that cough up toxins.

A Hearst Connecticu­t Media review of inspection­s over the last eight years points to a 40-percent decrease in inspection­s by the Department of Energy and Environmen­tal Protection.

It’s not hard to do the math. Budget cuts = fewer jobs. Fewer jobs = fewer inspection­s.

That doesn’t necessaril­y mean polluters are taking shortcuts, but consent orders calling for contaminat­ion cleanup are also down by 40 percent.

We’ve been hesitant to take a deep breath since former Connecticu­t DEEP Commission­er Robert Klee referred to the state as the “tailpipe of America” in 2016 in response to studies that the most troubling ozone levels in he Northeast were hovering across Fairfield County.

A spokeswoma­n for Gov. Ned Lamont sided with DEEP’s response to Hearst’s data, countering that the numbers don’t give a complete picture, that computers are filling in for a depleted workforce.

That picture remains a tad hazy. Reductions in pesticide inspection­s mean those chemicals you spray into the lawn may not meet state standards.

Former Gov. Dannel P. Malloy redirected DEEP’s mission when he took office by adding “Energy” to its name and responsibi­lities. Lamont’s appointmen­t of Katie Dykes to succeed Klee underscore­s the state’s needed commitment to reimagine its energy strategy.

But state and federal leaders must take heed to ensure Connecticu­t protects its air, particular­ly since it is vulnerable to pollutants from other states at a time when federal regulation­s are more lax than they have been in generation­s.

President Donald Trump’s anti-regulation­s approach has, for example, resulted in a reported 30year low in criminal prosecutio­ns by the Environmen­tal Protection Agency.

The climate is changing, and being shoved in the wrong direction.

This puts more pressure on states to be environmen­tal watchdogs. Some leaders saw the Hearst report as proof of existing concerns. State Rep. Joe Gresko, D-Stratford, a vice chairman of the Legislatur­e’s Environmen­t Committee, said “The reduction in staff has had a negative impact on the environmen­t and what’s really scary is the number (of DEEP employees) retiring in the next four years.”

Connecticu­t’s Congressio­nal delegation as well as Lamont and state leaders need to work together to fiercely defend our environmen­t.

We won’t breathe any easier until they do.

The state agency in charge of protecting the air we breathe has apparently been easing up on factories, gas stations and marinas that cough up toxins.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States