Stamford Advocate (Sunday)

Rebirth of low-level polluted properties blocked by old law

- By Ken Dixon

“The business community has long recognized that the Transfer Act as written has been an impediment to economic growth in this state.”

Frank Hird, real estate broker

Hundreds of vacant properties, many in cities that were former manufactur­ing hubs, but also smaller suburban buildings that might have housed businesses as mundane as dry cleaners, languish on the market for years because of half-century-old environmen­tal regulation­s.

For brokers like Frank Hird, of Branford, the state law called the Transfer Act is a hindrance to business. But to the state, it’s an obstacle to desperatel­y needed economic developmen­t for properties that generated only a small amount of, if any, hazardous material.

Hird voiced the real estate industry’s frustratio­ns re

cently, when he complained about the issue to Gov. Ned Lamont. During an event in the historic Shubert Theater, Garrett Sheehan, president of the Greater New Haven Chamber of Commerce, framed the issue for the governor, at the start of a question-and-answer session with over 100 chamber members.

Earlier, in the State Capitol, Sheehan had been among a dozen supporters of the need for big changes to a 1967 state law, to help ease the sale of properties. Sitting now on a raised platform with Lamont during a breakfast-time event, Sheehan framed the issue for the governor, then introduced Hird.

“The business community has long recognized that the Transfer Act as written has been an impediment to economic growth in this state,” Hird told Lamont. “We also believe that the end result will not only be an improved economy, but many of the polluted sites around the state that have been idle for years will be cleaned up and put back into productive use.”

Lamont noted that the state Department of Energy and Environmen­tal Protection is discussing the issue with the various stakeholde­rs.

“I don’t care necessaril­y about reducing a lot of environmen­tal standards, but I want to make sure they pass a cost-benefit analysis and I want to make sure you get an answer on a timely basis,” Lamont told Hird. “I want to make sure that we can do both: Protect our small state for the future and make sure we’re growing, and these regulation­s do not slow us down.”

Under bipartisan legislatio­n pending in the state Senate, the DEEP’s threeyear deadlines for assessing environmen­tal cleanups prior to sales, could be reduced to as little as a couple of months. And while Katy Dykes, DEEP commission­er, opposed the bill during a public hearing last month, state lawmakers are hoping for a compromise in an attempt to balance environmen­tal needs with the real estate market and economic developmen­t.

Hird serves on the volunteer group of environmen­tal consultant­s, brokers, lawyers and representa­tives of

the DEEP that has been discussing the issue with hopes for change. During an interview, he said that a recent deal he had in place for the sale of an older building on lower Chapel Street in New Haven fell through because of the Transfer Act delays.

Dry cleaners, furniture strippers, auto body repair shops

Unlike classic brownfield­s, where decades, if not generation­s of industrial waste were generated on properties, causing major headaches for developers and municipali­ties hoping to reuse the sites and revitalize their local economies, Transfer Act properties have histories of much lower-level pollution. Sales of sites can be held up over as little as a couple dozen gallons of waste from dry cleaning, furniture stripping or even auto body repair shops during any one-month period over the last 30 years.

“We’re one of only two states that has the Transfer Act, and the regulation­s in it are so stringent that it’s actually having unintended consequenc­es and a lot of these old industrial sites and properties are just sitting there, contaminat­ed, because of how strict the regulation­s are,” said state Rep. Caroline Simmons, D-Stamford, cochairman of the legislativ­e Commerce Committee.

“We’ve heard from a number of business owners including some legislator­s who have tried to sell properties or even try to clean up properties during their transactio­ns, and they haven’t been able to, due to how strict they are and how costly they are, particular­ly if you’re a small business like a local dry cleaner, or looking to buy a dry-cleaning business to clean it up and repurpose it for another business,” Simmons said. “The cost of the lawyers you have to hire to meet these requiremen­ts are so great.”

The bill was recently approved unanimousl­y in the committee.

“We’re trying to work with DEEP and the environmen­tal lawyers to make sure that we’re all working together toward the common goal, which is to protect our environmen­t, to make sure that hazardous substances aren’t getting into our water and air resources, but at the same time allowing businesses to comply with it in an easier way so that more properties get cleaned up and that more real estate transactio­ns are able to take place in this state,” Simmons said in an interview.

The act requires the DEEP to verify the findings of licensed environmen­tal profession­als that cleanup standards have been met. Currently, the DEEP has two staff members who verify about 78 properties a year. An analysis of the bill by the nonpartisa­n Office of Legislativ­e Research indicates that the agency would need five new staff to support a faster verificati­on process.

Simmons said that the current procedure is so arduous that banks often withdraw their interest in lending for particular proposals. “The process is taking so long, it’s essentiall­y killing a lot these projects, and as a result a lot of these properties are just sitting, contaminat­ed, and it’s sort of having the opposite effect, so what we’re trying to do is just update the statute and make it more workable for both businesses and our environmen­t,” she said

Hird agreed with Simmons that there is a lot at stake as the General Assembly inches toward its June 5 adjournmen­t deadline.

“We also believe that the end result will not only be an improved economy, but many of the polluted sites around the state that have been idle for years will be cleaned up and put back into productive use,” Hird said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States