Stamford Advocate (Sunday)

City revamps policy for posting results

- By Ignacio Laguarda

STAMFORD — Only four restaurant­s in Stamford currently show a “poor” ranking listed as their most recent health inspection report on the city’s website.

In the recent past, residents could find anywhere from a dozen failed inspection­s to 30 or 40 on the site at any given time.

But the drop in failures is not necessaril­y cause for celebratio­n for city diners.

The reason so many eateries are listed as “fair,” “acceptable” or “best” is due to a policy change in how the city posts inspection reports.

In the past, any inspection, no matter the grade, would be uploaded automatica­lly to the website.

But a few months ago, Health Department officials decided to only upload inspection­s with poor grades after a reinspecti­on was performed, giving restaurant owners a chance to improve conditions without the poor grade being posted. That decision came after input from restaurant owners and the Stamford Downtown Special Services District.

Sandy Goldstein, president of the DSSD, said the concern was that restaurant­s weren’t given time to correct infraction­s

“I think it’s wrong for the Health Department to put it online.”

Sandy Goldstein, president of the Stamford Downtown Special Services District, referring to first-time offenders

after an initial failed inspection.

Because of the previous policy, restaurant­s with otherwise good safety and health records in the past could be labeled as “poor” on the city’s website with just one bad inspection, even if the infraction­s found in the inspection were correctabl­e, she said.

“I think it’s wrong for the Health Department to put it online,” she said, referring to first-time offenders.

However, Goldstein said if a restaurant doesn’t fix a problem found in an inspection and fails a follow-up inspection, the city should be free to post that informatio­n online.

“I think the public has a right to know,” she said.

The policy change has severely cut down the number of failed inspection­s currently on the site. On top of that, what officials have said was a small technical glitch has

made a number of inspection­s previously available on the website disappear.

Deborah Miller, the interim director of environmen­tal inspection­s, said that after the policy change, a sign-off in the form of a checked box was required by inspectors before an inspection could be posted. That has lead to some inspection­s being kept off line by mistake, and some older inspection­s from 2017 and 2018 dropping out of the system because they didn’t have the sign-off box checked, she said.

Miller said inspectors are working to catch up on old inspection­s by going in and signing off on them, but it has proved to be a laborious effort. Nonetheles­s, she said the goal is to have all the unchecked inspection­s uploaded properly before the end of the month.

The vast majority of restaurant­s in Stamford have the highest possible health score.

The number of “poor” inspection grades fluctuates often, as the city conducts follow-up inspection­s to failing establishm­ents and either issues another substandar­d report card or improves the eatery’s grade to “fair,” “acceptable” or “best.”

Connecticu­t’s system grades food-serving establishm­ents on a 100-point scale. Each infraction deducts points from a restaurant’s grade. A “poor” grade results from a score below 80 or a restaurant receiving one or more four-point violations.

A four-point mark is the most serious infraction an establishm­ent can receive and includes problems such as food stored or served at an improper temperatur­e, poorly stored food, improperly stored or labeled toxic items, and lax personal hygiene among staff.

One four-point violation automatica­lly results in a poor grade, even if the restaurant receives an overall high score.

During restaurant visits, Stamford health inspectors test food to see if it falls within the bacteria “danger zone,” which is between 41 and 135 degrees Fahrenheit. Food in that range is more prone to bacterial growth.

When restaurant­s get a poor grade on an inspection, which are conducted without warning, they are supposed to be re-inspected within a few weeks. If the restaurant gets a low grade again, the owner is fined $150 and is required to appear before the city’s Health Inspection Division to discuss each infraction and establish a plan to address the problems.

A third violation means the business is subject to closure, at the discretion of the director of health. If the restaurant is shuttered, the owner must pay $300 to re-open.

To view the ratings of all Stamford restaurant­s, visit the city’s website.

 ?? Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? Stamford Health Inspector Timothy Noia discusses the forms used during an inspection after checking up on the Parkway Diner on March 3, 2016.
Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo Stamford Health Inspector Timothy Noia discusses the forms used during an inspection after checking up on the Parkway Diner on March 3, 2016.
 ?? Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? Ron Miller, former Director of Environmen­tal Inspection­s for the City of Stamford, scrolls through the city’s restaurant reviews website in his office on Feb. 24, 2016.
Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo Ron Miller, former Director of Environmen­tal Inspection­s for the City of Stamford, scrolls through the city’s restaurant reviews website in his office on Feb. 24, 2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States