Stamford Advocate (Sunday)

Conn.’s history as a gun manufactur­ing state clashes with tougher gun laws.

Despite regulation­s, manufactur­ing still strong

- By Rob Ryser rryser@newstimes.com 2037313342

When Stag Arms announced in June it was leaving Connecticu­t for a place with “significan­t support for the firearms industry,” the message to Hartford couldn’t have been clearer.

It’s not the first time a gun maker has complained that the state’s tough stance on firearms hurts an industry with deep ties to Connecticu­t’s history.

And yet, while it may be a blow to Connecticu­t to lose its secondlarg­est rifle maker, no one expects more manufactur­ers to follow suit when Stag Arms leaves New Britain with its 18 jobs for a gunfriendl­y state.

The reason: Colt, Ruger and other Connecticu­t firearms manufactur­ers have nationwide markets, so the effect of tough regulation­s, such as Connecticu­t’s ban on semiautoma­tic weapons, is negligible.

“What’s more important is the corporate income tax rate and any potential incentives a company might get out of the state,” said Mark Gius, a professor of economics at Quinnipiac University and the author of “Guns and Crime: The Data Don’t Lie.” “A very small amount of a company’s decision to leave has to do with the general political conversati­on about gun control, or whether the state has a problem with what it is producing.”

Industry officials and gun company executives agree, although they were not comfortabl­e saying so publicly last week as the nation continued to grapple with backtoback mass shootings in Texas and Ohio that left 31 dead and dozens injured.

What that means for the $1.2 billion gun industry in Connecticu­t is that the high cost of labor, utilities, and taxes in the state hurts the bottom line more than hostility from Hartford. At the same time, Connecticu­t’s highlyskil­led labor force and proximity to New York City suppliers make the state a hard place to leave, especially when it’s been home for generation­s.

But since the 2012 massacre of 26 firstgrade­rs and educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School, the gun industry and its supporters have often felt persecuted as successive governors have assailed the lethality of assault weapons and legislator­s have enacted some of the toughest gun control laws in the nation.

The Newtownbas­ed National Shooting Sports Foundation has defended Connecticu­t gun makers, producing a 2017 report arguing that Hartford’s tough regulation­s enacted after the Sandy Hook massacre cost the state 3,000 jobs and $50 million in taxes.

“Other states that did not pass adverse legislatio­n to the 2nd Amendment did not see decreases in revenue,” said the NSSF, which represents 13,000 gun makers and retailers nationwide.

Last week, no one at the NSSF was willing to speak, with tension still raw after the mass murder of 22 people in El Paso, Texas, on Aug. 3, and 9 people in Dayton, Ohio, on Aug. 4. Those shootings came just days after a gunman killed three and injured 13 at the Gilroy Garlic Festival in California.

So how is the overall health of firearms manufactur­ing in Connecticu­t?

The latest numbers send a mixed message.

By the numbers

On the one hand, Connecticu­t companies cut 400 jobs in 2018 — a drop of 14 percent from the 2,680 gun manufactur­ing jobs in Stratford, Shelton, Southport and across the state.

In the process, the firearms manufactur­ing industry lost 10 percent in economic production, according to NSSF data.

On the other hand, those 2018 numbers were down from 2017 — a huge year for Connecticu­t gun manufactur­ing that saw jobs jump 26 percent and economic output rise by 9 percent.

Moreover, even after the industry’s losses in 2018, Connecticu­t was still ranked sixth in the nation in per capita economic output, and second in the nation in the average industry wage of $75,000.

A spokesman for Gov. Ned Lamont said the state remained committed to its tough gun policy, while the gun industry remained on solid footing in Connecticu­t.

“[D]ecisions on gun policies need to reflect the importance of protecting our communitie­s from gun violence and accidental shootings,” said spokesman David Bednarz. “Connecticu­t is one of the top states in the nation in total economic output in this industry, and its economic impact has continued to remain steady over the last several years, even after our state adopted some of the most responsibl­e and sensible gun laws in the nation.”

It was not clear Friday when Stag Arms would move or in what state it would choose to manufactur­e its AR15style rifles. In 2017, the company produced 10,900 rifles, according to the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

The last time a highprofil­e gun company chose another state over Connecticu­t was 2014, when Ruger built a 200,000squaref­oot manufactur­ing plant in North Carolina. The year before, Colt had moved one of its rifle manufactur­ing production­s to Texas.

The Connecticu­t companies have contribute­d to steady growth for the gun industry nationwide, which grew by 1 percent in 2018 to $52 billion, employing 149,000 directly in manufactur­ing, according to the NSSF.

Although there are no industrywi­de numbers for gun sales, the FBI has been publishing firearm background checks for 20 years, which experts use to track commercial firearms trends.

So far this year through July, nationwide background checks are about 16 million — up 5 percent over the same seven months of 2018. In Connecticu­t, background checks are up 2 percent over the same period in 2018.

Meanwhile, Connecticu­t gun makers continue to produce firearms at a nationlead­ing pace.

Colt produced 32,000 pistols and 27,000 other firearms in 2017, for example, exporting 3,300 of them.

 ?? Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? Newtownbas­ed National Shooting Sports Foundation
Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo Newtownbas­ed National Shooting Sports Foundation

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States