Stamford Advocate (Sunday)

With Jordan doc as a backdrop, Warriors reflect on fallen dynasties

- THE WASHINGTON POST

Michael Jordan wasted no time setting up Jerry Krause as the man to blame for ending the Chicago Bulls’ dynasty.

In the first two episodes of “The Last Dance,” ESPN’s 10-part documentar­y which premiered last Sunday, Jordan didn’t hide his animosity toward the former Bulls general manager. Krause was painted as short, fat, ignorant of fashion trends, argumentat­ive, jealous, cheap, desperate for credit, inconsider­ate of team dynamics, and overeager to be done with Scottie Pippen, Jordan’s trusted sidekick, and Phil Jackson, the legendary coach.

This wasn’t a revisionis­t caricature. Jordan, in one archived video, looked up at Krause’s office when asked to identify the biggest challenge of the 1997-98 season. The Bulls exploded the following summer — Jordan retired, Pippen left for the Houston Rockets, and Jackson eventually took over the Los Angeles Lakers — but they spent their final year together driven by a shared contempt for the boss. They wanted to win their sixth title, in part, to spite the guy who was pre-emptively packing their bags.

These internal dynamics were incomprehe­nsible to some at the time and are regrettabl­e in hindsight. Today’s viewers can’t help but wonder why Jordan didn’t get Krause fired, why owner Jerry Reinsdorf took all that winning for granted and why the Bulls didn’t keep running it back until someone dethroned them.

Twenty years from now, the next generation of fans will raise similar questions about the Golden State Warriors, who won three titles and reached five straight Finals but saw their dynasty crumble last summer. How did Kevin Durant, Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, Draymond Green and Andre Iguodala — all of whom are headed to the Hall of Fame — only manage to win two titles together? Why was Durant so anxious to leave after three seasons? How did an organizati­on with clear philosophi­cal alignment at its highest levels succumb to internal strife?

The Warriors spent this week sifting through the rubble. Green put much of the onus on Durant during an interview with Showtime’s “All The Smoke” podcast, noting that the 2014 MVP became frustrated with Golden State’s offense during the 2017-18 season and that he had “one foot in and one foot out” throughout the 2018-19 season.

Green explained that tension bubbled over during an on-court argument in a 2018 game against the Los Angeles Clippers. Green and Durant didn’t see eye to eye on a lategame play, and their dispute ultimately led Green to question Durant’s commitment to the Warriors in advance of his 2019 free agency. To placate Durant, management suspended Green for a game once he refused to apologize — an unsatisfac­tory resolution for all parties.

Management ignored warnings about Durant’s brewing discontent, continued Green, who argued that he shouldn’t be scapegoate­d for Durant’s eventual departure for the Brooklyn Nets. If Durant had wanted to re-sign, Golden State could have traded Green or reworked the roster to appease him.

“I understand the business of basketball,” Green said. “If Kevin Durant wants to be somewhere and he doesn’t want me here, I’m out.”

For Warriors coach Steve Kerr, who was a sharpshoot­ing guard on Jordan’s Bulls, incessant media attention complicate­s life for franchise players and superteams by exacerbati­ng minor conflicts. In an interview with ESPN’s “The Jump,” Kerr said that he believed Jordan retired in 1993 to play baseball because “he was fried emotionall­y from the scrutiny only he felt.”

Durant was put under the microscope when he left the Oklahoma City Thunder for the Warriors in 2016, and incidents like his dispute with Green drove news cycles and social media discourse throughout his three-year stay in the Bay Area. There were strange twists and turns, including Durant’s decision to use anonymous accounts to defend himself in online debates and to impose an extended media blackout. Kerr said the modern media environmen­t would have led Jordan to “act differentl­y and adapt.”

Jordan enjoyed other advantages over Durant. The Bulls were built in his image, while Durant joined an organizati­on constructe­d around Curry. Jordan and Jackson shared an intense loyalty after growing up together as champions, while Durant and Kerr didn’t quite see eye-to-eye, particular­ly on the Warriors’ offensive style.

Jordan was a natural locker room leader, while the more introverte­d Durant never emerged as Golden State’s loudest voice. Jordan was the most popular athlete on the planet throughout his prime, while Durant was resigned to the fact that he wouldn’t eclipse Curry among Warriors fans.

Yet Durant had his own edges. He played for a deferentia­l GM in Bob Myers, a former agent who has given out generous contracts to core players and once said that Durant had “earned the right to sign whatever deal he wants.” He played with Curry, a two-time MVP who willingly took a step back to share the stage and the burden. He played on loaded rosters that breezed to the 2017 title, survived a stiff challenge from the Houston Rockets before claiming the 2018 championsh­ip, and advanced to the 2019 Finals despite his untimely injury in the second round.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States