Stamford Advocate (Sunday)

Challenges grow for single moms during pandemic

- By Isabella Zou

Working mothers in Connecticu­t and across the nation have been disproport­ionately impacted from the pandemic, experienci­ng everything from job loss to increased household and child care burdens. But these impacts are being felt most sharply by single mothers, who have endured through COVID without the support of a second parent.

“They’re stretched to the limit,” said Dr. Marika Lindholm, former lecturer at Northweste­rn University and founder of support network Empowering Solo Moms Everywhere. “They were already stretched before, and now it’s just so much more psychologi­cally and physically and financiall­y to contend with.”

According to the National Women’s Law Center, 2.3 million women have left the labor force since the start of the pandemic. Their labor force participat­ion rate was 57 percent in February, compared with 59.2 percent in February 2020, and had not been this low since 1988. One recent McKinsey study on working women found that six years of progress in women’s equality could be erased by COVID as women leave the workplace and, due in part to lack of child care options, don’t come back.

In Connecticu­t, a recent study by the Permanent Commission on the Status of Women on women’s economic security during COVID surveyed 1,020 women — representi­ng a pool that closely mirrored the state’s demographi­cs — from October 5 to February 5. It found that 26.5 percent of women have either been furloughed or lost their jobs due to COVID.

Women made up 58 percent of the service industry before COVID hit, according to another Pew report, and by mid-April, nearly 5.7 million women had lost those jobs, compared with 3.2 million men.

The toll on women is so severe it was acknowledg­ed by President Joe Biden during his April 28 address to Congress as he announced a plan to invest $225 billion for child care initiative­s that, among other things, would make it easier for women to stay employed.

“Two million women have dropped out of the workforce during this pandemic — two million. And too often because they couldn’t get the care they needed to care for their child or care for an elderly parent who needs help,” Biden said.

But in many ways, the pandemic pressures that have harmed all women have hit single moms even harder.

Nationally, mothers of young children lost work at three times the rate of fathers in the pandemic—a 12 percent drop between February and August, according to a September Pew Stateline report. The loss was even worse for single mothers, who lost 16 percent of jobs in that time period, compared with a 6 percent drop for single fathers.

According to the analysis, in April 2020, the number of single mothers with jobs was 22 percent lower than it was in April 2019, compared with a 9 percent decline for other families with children.

In Connecticu­t, single parent households were already struggling disproport­ionately pre-COVID. According to the 2020 ALICE Report by Connecticu­t United Way, which gives an annual report on basic cost of living in the state, 73 percent of households led by single moms don’t make enough to cover their basic needs, whereas 38 percent of all households statewide fall beneath that threshold.

The PCSW study found that single moms reported a higher incidence of housing insecurity and impaired ability to buy food during COVID compared with the total population of women surveyed — 30.2 percent relative to 21.3 percent for housing insecurity, and 16.5 percent relative to 11.5 percent for difficulty buying food.

“Single moms already have a big burden on them,” Lindholm said. “They’re sacrificin­g so much for their kids. They’re sacrificin­g sleep, they’re sacrificin­g self-care. They’re already vulnerable; they’re already at risk. And then you add this whole component of being isolated, and not having the community that you norma

lly rely on.”

Child care

In PCSW’s study, when women were asked what single factor would most support their economic security, the top response was support for balancing work and child care responsibi­lities, including child care affordabil­ity and capacity, children in school and flexible work arrangemen­ts.

There are barriers to accessing child care, and struggles the child care industry itself is facing, that compound to impair women.

“If you’re a single parent, unless you happen to be a single lawyer or something, you’re probably not making enough money to pay for care at the market rate,” said Merrill Gay, executive director of the Early Childhood Alliance.

For those who potentiall­y qualify for a child care subsidy under Connecticu­t Care 4 Kids, Gay described the process as a “chicken and egg” scenario.

“You need to have child care to get the job, but you need the job to qualify for child care,” he said. Even after applying, it can take a month to get approved, whereas other states give up to three months’ subsidy up front, he said.

Biden’s recently passed federal stimulus package includes $40 billion for child care around the country, $276 million of which will go to Connecticu­t. In March, Governor Ned Lamont dedicated $50 million of that sum over two years to expanding eligibilit­y to parents enrolled in higher education and workforce training programs, with the aim of supporting those preparing to return to the workforce.

Even when approved, families usually must pay a monthly fee to receive their subsidies. In December, Governor Lamont dedicated $8 million to waiving these fees for six months, from April 1 to September 30, 2021—an average of $129 per month for families.

Still, there are many who remain left out. Among the ineligible are those in the state who fall between the poverty line and the ALICE threshold – more than a quarter of households led by single moms.

To further help families, Biden’s COVID relief plan includes an expanded child tax credit. Families this year will receive a $3,000 benefit per child ages 6 to 17, and $3,600 per child under 6, up from $2,000 per child. Some of this will come in the form of monthly checks from July to December, of $250 per month for each child ages 6

to 17, and $300 per month for children under 6, in what resembles a form of guaranteed basic income.

U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-CT, has championed these policies for decades and wants to make them permanent, a step that has been framed as a vital step toward a policy framework that would better support working women.

Tina Courpas, executive director of the Permanent Commission on the Status of Women, stressed the importance of the stimulus money for child care, an industry that encompasse­s “women’s ability to work and advance in their career.” But in order to make lasting change in Connecticu­t’s child care infrastruc­ture, legislator­s need to think about the long term, she said.

“After the next two years, when these allocation­s are used up, there will be somewhat of a cliff — what happens after that?” Courpas said. “Because there’s funding in the system to try some of these expansions and pilot certain solutions, this is an ideal time for us to test drive some of these solutions and see if they can be implemente­d in the long term.”

Reduced demand due to COVID has put the entire industry in jeopardy — in Connecticu­t, child care centers receive state funding based on the number of students enrolled. According to Gay, more than 100 daycare centers and more than 100 licensed family child care providers have closed during the pandemic.

“When we start to really reopen the economy more, it’s gonna be slowed down by the fact that there isn’t child care capacity,” he said. Numerous experts have cited this as a cause of concern for women’s return to the labor force. In August 2020, the Census Bureau found that 19.6 percent of unemployed working-age adults weren’t working because COVID had disrupted their child care arrangemen­ts, of which women aged 25-44 were almost three times as likely as men to say they weren’t working due to child care demands.

The child care industry’s struggle impacts not only the mothers it serves, but also the women it employs. According to the National Women’s Law Center, 95 percent of child care workers nationally are women — and 1 in 6 child care jobs across the nation have been lost since the start of the pandemic. They were paid a

“poverty wage” to begin with — according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ May 2020 report, child care workers make a median hourly wage of $12.98 in Connecticu­t. Further, UC Berkeley’s 2020 Early Childhood Workforce Index found that “for a single adult with one child, median child care worker wages do not meet a living wage in any state.”

“We don’t value the work of people who work in early childhood enough,” Sen. Mae Flexer, D-Killingly, said. “The only way to address that is to think about [child care] as critical infrastruc­ture for our society. Connecticu­t needs to partner with the federal government to finally get a handle on this problem.”

Gay said the state is working on distributi­ng the $120 million allocated for grants to child care providers—applicatio­ns will open soon to providers. The money will be vital to help providers “get stabilized,” Gay said.

Jill Marini, director of early learning and school age programs for YWCA Hartford, said that the five sites she runs are operating at around 50 percent capacity. In the fall, it ranged from 25 percent to 50 percent, but as parents become more comfortabl­e and optimistic and vaccinatio­ns have been rolling out, enrollment is “slowly creeping up.”

“Because there’s so many spaces available, and they’re not being filled, the math [has made] less and less sense,” she said. They closed their Manchester site at the end of October.

She expects the upcoming grant money to help immensely with basic operating costs such as staffing, purchasing supplies like bleach and hand sanitizers, and supporting administra­tive efforts to apply for more grants.

“Every dollar that comes to us counts,” she said. “We’re an underfunde­d field anyway, we’re an underfunde­d part of the community. Every grant helps.”

Work-from-home burnout

Even single moms who still have jobs, and can do those jobs from home, are worse off than their partnered or childfree counterpar­ts. A fall 2020 study suggests that the pandemic has outsized impacts on mothers working remotely. They spend more time doing housework than their spouses, work more often with

children present, and more frequently report feelings of anxiety, loneliness and depression.

“We very specifical­ly find that telecommut­ing really worsens mothers’ work environmen­t, in a way that it doesn’t for fathers,” said Thomas Lyttleton, a PhD student in Yale University’s department of sociology and the lead author for the paper.

A May 2020 report from Boston Consulting Group found that since quarantine began, parents spend an average of 27 more hours a week on domestic labor like chores and child care, with women performing 15 more hours per week than their spouses.

The PCSW study reported that 66.1 percent of Connecticu­t women with dependent children said their ability to work had been impaired due to increased home demands.

“Everything is going to be worse for single mothers,” Lyttleton added. “Even though we see these inequaliti­es at a couple level, where mothers do a lot more housework, fathers at least do some. And so in situations in which there’s only one parent to do both the entirety of child care and housework and hold down a job, and also all the institutio­nal child care is closed in many locations — that is just a terrible terrible situation.”

The PCSW study also reported that 49.8 percent of Connecticu­t women experience­d an impairment to their mental health due to COVID. This was the “single most uniformly reported factor” across race, ethnicity, age, income level and geography, Courpas said.

Kimberly Cuervas, a professor in the University of Connecticu­t’s Department of Psychologi­cal Sciences who studies executive function in the brain, emphasized the pandemic’s mental impact on both caregivers and their kids.

“Stress can have a negative impact on our ability to use our critical thinking, or our higher-order thinking skills,” she said. This includes our “ability to focus our attention, especially when there’s distractio­n, to resist temptation, to take our time to think before responding.”

This can be especially difficult for single moms, who suffer a greater lack of support, she said.

“Their support network’s not there,” she said. “Even family support too—you’re social distancing from extended family, or even your friends, who are your support network. There are no playdates, et cetera.”

Poor policies

These conditions are made worse by lack of supportive labor policy and flexible work arrangemen­ts.

In 2019, the state passed a paid family and medical leave bill that will guarantee all workers up to 12 weeks of

paid time off to care for an ill relative or a new child, or if they themselves are sick. This takes effect in January 2022.

In the meantime, a federal law passed in March gave only a patchwork framework for paid time off, leaving it to be decided on an employer-by-employer basis and failing to guarantee it for all workers. For example, the law excludes companies with more than 500 employees, and small companies can apply for an exemption.

Most recently, Biden’s American Rescue Plan includes 15 weeks of paid family and medical leave for full time federal employees and expands tax credits to incentiviz­e employers to offer paid time off. But still, there is no universal guarantee for all workers.

“As someone who’d been working on paid family medical leave for several years, I can’t help but look at what’s happening right now and think, what a difference this policy would have made if we got our acts together and put it in place sooner,” Flexer said. Even with Connecticu­t’s law in place, the situation wouldn’t be perfect. “Some countries give new parents up to a year of paid leave,” she pointed out.

In the meantime, fair labor laws would also have been helpful for women during this time. Lindsay Farrell, former state director of the Connecticu­t Working Families Party and now senior political strategist for the national organizati­on, described the importance of fair workplace scheduling practices to counter the effects of “on call scheduling.”

“Per current rules in the state of Connecticu­t, if you work at a McDonald’s or Target or one of those stores, they can require that you be on call up to the day before,” she said. “That means they can tell you at 11:30 at night, you need to be in to help open the store at 7 in the morning—or they can tell you you’re unneeded. There’s no requiremen­t about giving people reasonable notice.”

The inability to have notice before a shift, or to generally know what their work week might look like, saddles workers with a sense of instabilit­y and unpredicta­bility, she said, making it difficult, “especially with a lacking public transporta­tion system that we have in Connecticu­t, to juggle things like child care, to have a second job to pick up more income, to juggle any other responsibi­lities.”

These difficulti­es are felt most sharply by women, who not only make up a disproport­ionate share of the service sector, including food service and hospitalit­y, but also shoulder more responsibi­lities at home.

“[Fair workplace scheduling] would help every hourly low wage workers, but would mean more for women,” Farrell said.

“They’re stretched to the limit. They were already stretched before, and now it’s just so much more psychologi­cally and physically and financiall­y to contend with.”

Dr. Marika Lindholm, founder of support network Empowering Solo Moms Everywhere

 ?? Yehyun Kim / CTmirror.org ?? Moneisha Bryan runs with her youngest son, Myron Hodges Jr., 4, on her back. “Now I’m fine with not knowing,” Bryan said. “So now, [I’m] accepting myself and still working towards my goal. … That’s how I’m different after the pandemic.”
Yehyun Kim / CTmirror.org Moneisha Bryan runs with her youngest son, Myron Hodges Jr., 4, on her back. “Now I’m fine with not knowing,” Bryan said. “So now, [I’m] accepting myself and still working towards my goal. … That’s how I’m different after the pandemic.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States