Stamford Advocate (Sunday)

Stamford firm levels lawsuit against electronic­s giant Philips

- By Veronica Del Valle

STAMFORD — A Stamford-based law firm is representi­ng clients in a class action lawsuit against multinatio­nal electronic­s giant Philips after a sweeping recall of some of its ventilator­s left clients saying they are waiting indefinite­ly for relief or replacemen­ts.

According to the suit, filed by Silver Golub & Teitell, Philips recalled a series of its ventilator­s in June 2021 that use a polyester

based foam as noise abatement. The company issued a recall after it found that a defective component — known as PE-PUR foam — can irritate users’ airways by emitting small particles into their lungs.

Across 17 different products, Philips expects to recall between three and four million ventilator­s and sleep apnea devices, known as Continuous Positive Airway Pressure or CPAP machines. The American Sleep Associatio­n estimates that most CPAP machines cost about $850, but some of the Philips ventilator­s marketed for more than $1,200.

That hefty price tag forms one of the points of the three class action suits against Philips. To replace these ventilator­s — which some of the plaintiffs say they require to stay alive — the law firm argues that all users must take a considerab­le hit to their wallets, especially because they say the Philips “recall program provides no relief for users of the ... devices.”

To date, consumers have lodged “several complaints about the presence of black debris/particles within the device’s air pathway” according to the Food and Drug Administra­tion. The company has also received reports of “headache, upper airway irritation, cough, chest pressure and sinus infection,” though the FDA said the symptoms could not be linked to the defective foam with certainty.

Philips released a warning after the products were recalled, saying long-term exposure to the foam in question could also cause respirator­y issues, hypersensi­tivity, nausea and vomiting along with other “possible toxic and carcinogen­ic effects.”

“We’ve heard some people who have decided that they had to keep using the machine despite the health risks,” said Ian Sloss, an attorney for Silver Golub & Teitell. “People have said things like, ‘I have to use this machine that could be poisoning me, but I can’t drive if I don’t sleep. I can’t sleep unless I use this machine, and I can’t afford to go buy (a) $1,000 machine.’ ”

Philips told The Stamford Advocate that “given the number of devices currently in use (... about half are in the U.S.), [it is] not able to provide an immediate solution at this time.” However, spokesman Mario Fante said the company is “producing repair kits and replacemen­t devices in large quantities” to ease the burden of the loss.

“We fully understand the impact that this is having on patients, as their well-being is at the heart of everything we do at Philips,” Fante said.

The details of the recall are also contested in the lawsuit. Currently, Philips asks machine users to register their devices online to receive a repair kit or replacemen­t.

“They also give absolutely no timeline as to when you can expect this to happen,” Sloss said.

The CPAP machines and ventilator­s are Philip’s second major recall of the year. Almost immediatel­y after it recalled its first set of ventilator­s, the company also pulled thousands of high-powered ventilator­s from the shelves. At least 61 adverse incidents and 25 injuries have been linked to the defects, with no deaths reported, according to the FDA.

 ?? Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo ?? The personal injury lawfirm Silver, Golub & Teitell.
Hearst Connecticu­t Media file photo The personal injury lawfirm Silver, Golub & Teitell.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States