Stamford Advocate (Sunday)

As Stone Academy audit proceeds, students looking for some answers

- By Alex Putterman

As state regulators move ahead with an audit of the Stone Academy nursing program, school attorneys and state agencies fight over details of the program’s closure and former students continue to demand answers.

According to records obtained by CT Insider, Stone Academy and various state agencies have traded increasing­ly contentiou­s correspond­ence, presenting vastly different perspectiv­es on the circumstan­ces that led the school to close last month and the Office of the Attorney General to launch an investigat­ion.

At issue are questions of whether Stone Academy needed to be shut down, how state agencies executed the closure, whether or not the school must pay for an audit into students’ transcript­s and, most pressingly, what this means for hundreds of nursing students currently stuck in limbo.

State regulators allege that Stone Academy, a forprofit program with campuses in Waterbury, West Haven and East Hartford, failed to maintain proper attendance records, exceeded allowable studentto-staff ratios, hired unqualifie­d instructor­s, held clinical instructio­n in nonclinica­l spaces and produced unacceptab­ly low passage rates for students taking licensing exams.

As a result, the state asked that that the school pay $200,000 toward an audit that will determine which Stone Academy credits are and aren’t valid. On Monday, the Office of Higher Education officially

contracted with a national firm that will conduct the review over the coming months, paid for by the state, executive director Timothy Larson said.

“It’s important that we have an outside auditor look at all of these components so that we can address refunds appropriat­ely, we can make sure that this permanent record transcript is reconciled to the extent we can do that,” Larson said.

In correspond­ence obtained by CT Insider, lawyers for Stone Academy dispute most of the state’s accusation­s, arguing that the school was not required to maintain attendance records, that its ratios were not above what was legally permitted and that its clinical instructio­n was in compliance with a pandemic-era executive order. They acknowledg­e the school had several instructor­s who did not meet licensing requiremen­ts but say that figure is lower than the state alleges.

As for passage rates, which dipped below 50 percent at some Stone Academy programs, attorneys for the school say the

concerning trend “reflects the unusual strains inflicted by the pandemic both on the institutio­n but, more importantl­y, its student body” during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a letter sent from a Stone Academy representa­tive to the Office of the Attorney General.

Moreover, Stone Academy attorneys say the state’s Office of Higher Education rushed the school’s closure, rejecting efforts to establish “teach-out” plans that would have let students finish their degrees. At one point, they alleged in a legal filing, officials from the Office of Higher Education, including Larson, personally seized transcript­s and other documents from Stone Academy offices, behaving in a “haphazard and unprofessi­onal manner.”

While Stone Academy attorneys have not fought the closure of the school, they have resisted the state’s requests that they pay for an audit.

“The Office of Higher Education’s actions are so bungled and chaotic they would be comical if not so devastatin­g,” Stone Academy attorney Perry Rowthorn

said in a statement. “An unnecessar­y audit that will wrongly disenfranc­hise hundreds of students’ legitimate­ly earned credits is the exact opposite of student protection. ... OHE would be well-advised to abandon it.”

In an interview Tuesday, Larson blamed Stone Academy for fighting against an audit that would have provided clarity on some of the state’s allegation­s. He denied acting inappropri­ately with regard to the document seizure, saying he and his staff followed proper protocols.

“They are purporting things that are just not accurate,” he said.

‘We were left in the dark’

As state regulators and Stone Academy lawyers spar, the situation has left hundreds of nursing students who attended the school in a sort of purgatory, unable to take licensing exams without degrees and unable to transfer their credits to other programs without accredited transcript­s.

At a protest Tuesday outside the Office of Higher Education in Hartford, more than a dozen former Stone students chanted “Teach-out plan, now” while holding signs with

Larson’s face and the words “credit thief” and “Larson-y.” One former student wore a Stone Academy sweatshirt with “Stone” crossed out and replaced with “Scam.” An attorney representi­ng some of the students, Cynthia Jennings, urged them to resist the audit and demand they be allowed to transfer their credits to other schools.

Symia Lyles, a single mother of three who was 10 months into a nursing program at Stone’s East Hartford campus when the school closed, said she was “completely frustrated” to have her plans derailed, especially amid a widespread nursing shortage.

“It’s crazy to me because our nurse community is suffering,” she said. “There’s a need for nurses, so I don’t understand why they wouldn’t be more caring on the situation.”

 ?? Alex Putterman/Hearst Connecticu­t Media ?? At a protest in Hartford on Tuesday, former Stone Academy students chanted “Teach out, now” and held signs criticizin­g Timothy Larson, executive director of the Office of Higher Education. Larson later said he was “disappoint­ed” to see the protest.
Alex Putterman/Hearst Connecticu­t Media At a protest in Hartford on Tuesday, former Stone Academy students chanted “Teach out, now” and held signs criticizin­g Timothy Larson, executive director of the Office of Higher Education. Larson later said he was “disappoint­ed” to see the protest.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States