Stamford Advocate

Environmen­tal groups urge closing of CT’s only ash landfill

- By John Moritz

Environmen­talists sounded off Wednesday against plans to keep Connecticu­t’s only ash disposal landfill operating for the next several decades in Putnam, where they say it threatens to leak contaminan­ts into local groundwate­r and the nearby Quinebaug River.

The landfill, operated by Wheelabtra­tor since 1999, is the disposal site for about 525,000 tons of ash produced each year by trash-toenergy plants in New York and Connecticu­t, including the company’s large incinerato­r in Bridgeport.

However, Wheelabrat­or said it will likely run out of space to dispose of that ash in the next few years, unless it is granted permission to expand its current 60acre site to about 128 acres. That would expand its life cycle by up to 30 years and allow millions of additional tons of ash to be dumped there.

Closing the dump would force ash produced in Connecticu­t to be routed to other facilities in Massachuse­tts and other surroundin­g states, the company said in documents.

The company’s request to expand the landfill and modify its existing permits is under review by the state Department of Energy and Environmen­tal Protection, which granted preliminar­y approval to the project in June. Local opponents subsequent­ly petitioned to force a public comment hearing Wednesday, at which environmen­tal advocates raised numerous concerns over the project while local officials defended Wheelabrat­or’s track record in the area.

Opponents questioned the need for the proposed landfill expansion by pointing to the planned closure of one of the largest incinerato­rs sending ash to the site, and raised concerns about the presence of toxic PFAS chemicals in treated wastewater released into the Quinebaug River.

“The landfill expansion is an unnecessar­y and ineffectiv­e waste solution,” said Huda Khwaja, an attorney for the Conservati­on Law Foundation based in Vermont. “We are concerned that the ash at Putman contains chemicals that are not properly treated when discharged, and will inevitably leak within the units as well.”

While the proposed expansion received opposition from both regional environmen­tal organizati­ons such as the Sierra Club and the Rivers Alliance of Connecticu­t, local residents were more divided over the plan. Several local officials pointed to a hefty sum — $60 million over 20 years — that Putnam has received in host fees for allowing Wheelabrat­or to dump its ash at the landfill.

That money has allowed the town to stabilize its tax rate and invest in capital projects, such as the recent constructi­on of a new municipal building, Mayor Barney Seney said Wednesday. He added that he had no qualms with the company’s environmen­tal record.

“I can say over 20 years, every issue that was brought up by any citizen within the town of Putnam, or any elected official, was handled in a profession­al manner and that the issue was addressed to the satisfacti­on of everybody involved,” Seney said.

While officials from other towns did not testify about the project, Wheelabrat­or Vice President Don Musial told a reporter Wednesday that the company has no plans to shutter its wasteto-energy plants in Bridgeport, Lisbon and Westcheste­r, N.Y. If the Putnam landfill closes, waste ash from those plants would be exported elsewhere, he said.

The company regularly tests both its wastewater and nearby groundwate­r for contaminan­ts, he added.

“Putnam monofill, we’ve operated for 20 years with very stringent environmen­tal monitoring requiremen­ts,” Musial said. “The results of all of that monitoring has found nothing that would ever be attributed to an actual defect or an issue with the ash monofill.”

Beyond local concerns, opponents of the plan said that any contaminat­ion that occurs from the landfill has the potential to impact a broad swath of property down the Quinebaug River watershed and eventually Long Island Sound.

“We have not asked those constituen­ts, ‘Do they want to welcome these toxins’?” said Hope O’Shaughness­y, a resident of Putnam who spoke against the project.

DEEP will hold an evidentiar­y hearing next week that will include testimony from both Wheelabrat­or and opponents of the project, before closing out the hearing process and issuing a final determinat­ion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States